> Wayland will be the main target of LXQt 2.1 development where as with LXQt 2.0 the main focus was on moving from Qt5 to Qt6.
A bit more...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Search Result
Collapse
34 results in 0.0213 seconds.
Keywords
Members
Tags
-
- Likes 12
-
I still use Solaris (10 I think?) w/ CDE for my oldest (pre-2005) products. :-/ To be fair, support of them is very rare. We still had Sun workstations...
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
> Do you actively use the #F2FS file-system?
Yes, but I don't use Twitter. ;-) I've used F2FS for years on every eMMC and SSD system...
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
jwh7 replied to Schedutil Frequency Invariance Revised For Better Intel Performance + Power Efficiencyin Intel Linux -
I've been using it for over a year on a T420 and a few other systems under Arch (and Arch32), with systemd networkd/resolved, no network manager. Last...
Leave a comment:
-
Same here; I've been using LXQt with Arch on several machines for many years with no problems, and that includes using the Git repo for most of 2018....
Leave a comment:
-
By "current implementation" do you mean versus wpa_supplicant? It is much simpler to use, faster, and for those who care*...smaller (iwd is...
Leave a comment:
-
How can you forget F2SS support, Michael?! :-)
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...-Supports-F2FS...
Leave a comment:
-
ConnMan is the preferred front-end I think, but I just use the iwctl utility (and systemd-networkd), and it is tremendously better/easier/faster(/stronger?)...
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Bottom Ad
Collapse
Leave a comment: