Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Git 2.42 Released With Less Warnings For SHA-256 Usage

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Git 2.42 Released With Less Warnings For SHA-256 Usage

    Phoronix: Git 2.42 Released With Less Warnings For SHA-256 Usage

    Git 2.42 is out today as the newest feature update for this dominant open-source distributed revision control system...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Huh? I thought SHA-256 was default.

    Comment


    • #3
      Git 2.42 Released With FEWER Warnings For SHA-256 Usage .... </pedant>

      ​

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by GingerDog View Post
        Git 2.42 Released With FEWER Warnings For SHA-256 Usage .... </pedant>

        ​
        "Less" used this way is perfectly cromulent.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by GingerDog View Post
          Git 2.42 Released With FEWER Warnings For SHA-256 Usage .... </pedant>

          ​
          Yeah. "a warning", "five warnings", "fewer warnings". "a sand?" "five sands?" "less sand". The concept of countable and uncountable nouns still exists, despite us having muddled the waters by making "a water" shorthand for "a glass of water" and making "a bread", "a wine", "a cheese" shorthand for "a type of..." (eg. pumpernickel, 1984 chateaux la feet, brie)
          Last edited by ssokolow; 21 August 2023, 10:21 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by nadir View Post

            "Less" used this way is perfectly cromulent.
            Thanks, Stannis.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ssokolow View Post

              Yeah. "a warning", "five warnings", "fewer warnings". "a sand?" "five sands?" "less sand". The concept of countable and uncountable nouns still exists, despite us having muddled the waters by making "a water" shorthand for "a glass of water" and making "a bread", "a wine", "a cheese" shorthand for "a type of..." (eg. pumpernickel, 1984 chateaux la feet, brie)
              Less being used this way dates back to before the Norman conquest of England, over a thousand years ago. It's fine. It's always been fine. Give it a rest

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by justinkb View Post

                Less being used this way dates back to before the Norman conquest of England, over a thousand years ago. It's fine. It's always been fine. Give it a rest
                I'm a champion of singular "they", which has been around for about 500 years (about the same amount of time as gender-neutral use of "he"), but going back a thousand years... and especially back to when our modern language hadn't yet formed from efforts to replace Old English with Old Norman, requires some citations.

                At the very least, I'd want to be sure you're not trying to justify bringing back something that was common a thousand years ago, but died out four or five hundred years ago.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
                  Huh? I thought SHA-256 was default.
                  It never was.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by nadir View Post

                    "Less" used this way is perfectly cromulent.
                    Indubitably.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X