Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Latest Winevulkan Patches Make It Usable For Doom, Wolfenstein & DXVK

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • shmerl
    replied
    Originally posted by Vash63 View Post
    Didn't Oracle win the case that made APIs copyrightable?
    Not in Europe, and that result should be really appealed in US too. Google just didn't go with that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vash63
    replied
    Originally posted by shmerl View Post

    So it's about LGPL being incompatible with Apache? How about general idea, that APIs should not be copyrightable? In this sense, it doesn't matter what license Vulkan API source has.

    And if not, how can that be resolved (and who came up with the idea of using a restrictive license for the API source)?
    Didn't Oracle win the case that made APIs copyrightable?

    Leave a comment:


  • shmerl
    replied
    Originally posted by Thunderbird View Post

    The code is open however over time the license changed (BSD -> Apache).
    So it's about LGPL being incompatible with Apache? How about general idea, that APIs should not be copyrightable? In this sense, it doesn't matter what license Vulkan API source has.

    And if not, how can that be resolved (and who came up with the idea of using a restrictive license for the API source)?
    Last edited by shmerl; 15 March 2018, 09:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Thunderbird
    replied
    Originally posted by shmerl View Post

    Can you elaborate on that please? I thought Vulkan API code is opened. And is there any bug to track about that?
    The code is open however over time the license changed (BSD -> Apache).

    Leave a comment:


  • shmerl
    replied
    Originally posted by Thunderbird View Post
    We can't support anything newer for now (Vulkan licensing issues).
    Can you elaborate on that please? I thought Vulkan API code is opened. And is there any bug to track about that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Thunderbird
    replied
    Originally posted by shmerl View Post

    Does it still need to specify 1.0.51 and why exactly?
    The version there doesn't matter so much, but it matches the version of Vulkan I support. We can't support anything newer for now (Vulkan licensing issues).

    Leave a comment:


  • shmerl
    replied
    Originally posted by Thunderbird View Post
    I have included winevulkan.json in the wine-vulkan repo now, so no need for text editing.
    Does it still need to specify 1.0.51 and why exactly?

    Leave a comment:


  • shmerl
    replied
    Result: The Witcher 3 (upstream Wine master with pending patches + dxvk direct image mapping branch).

    Last edited by shmerl; 15 March 2018, 07:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • AdamOne
    replied
    Originally posted by Thunderbird View Post
    It is correct that you are seeing a white screen. My latest patches have not been merged yet. If lucky they get merged today else for the time being use wine-vulkan. BTW just a simple text editor is enough to create the json file.
    Thank you so much for the hint.

    Leave a comment:


  • Thunderbird
    replied
    I have included winevulkan.json in the wine-vulkan repo now, so no need for text editing.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X