Originally posted by Vim_User
View Post
Therefor u search the one case that most people would agree to. To proove that gpl is shit in every case.
Its like people that make a scenario that can in reality happen where somebody dies if you dont torture the prisoner. But what u want then in reality is that torture is allowed in general.
if you think people should not use gpl because it makes them more unfree in your cracy mind, proove that the 99% software are wrong not try it on the 1% corner case.
The problem with bsd/mit is that we live in a world in there proprietary software and antifeatures and emprisioning users is allowed because of that, rms writes this "virus" called GPL to at least give authors the possibility to make that happen for their work.
Of course in a perfect world were ideas cant be patented and software cant be sold without the source code, bsd lisense would be just enough.
Again u will see that not like me, but dont try to pick such a cornercase. I am shure u used in your life a "illegal" copy at one point of a proprietary software, so does that proof that proprietary software rights are wrong? No, they are wrong but thats no proof of it.
Leave a comment: