Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ALSA 1.0.19 Released With Many Changes
Collapse
X
-
If only competitors would manufacture a DSP chip with hardware mixing and hardware OpenAL support, Creative may actually suffer any impact. until then, they still hold much of the market (at the development phase), but that hold is quickly dissolving. Will OpenAL be allowed to mature and have different hardware implementations just like OpenGL does? I certainly hope so, I wouldn't hold my breath for this or the next year, though.
-
Again, the epithets are not called for. As an aside, Creative happens to be the foster parent of OpenAL at the moment, and they keep developing it from what I see. Their Vista drivers actually depend on it.
[Rant warning!]
Creative treats OpenAL much like EAX: another method to tie developers and users to its proprietary hardware. They left their "sample implementation" to die (just try to use OpenAL SI on x86_64 - windows or linux, it doesn't matter!) Which is what Creative wants, actually: "hey, prefer our hardware, it's the only one with good OpenAL support!" By not providing a sample implementation, they effectively stiffle any potential competition.
Fortunately, a bright man, Chris Robinson, has single-handedly implemented what Creative will not (or cannot) do: OpenAL Soft, a fast, free software implementation of OpenAL 1.1 + extensions which works across all platforms and hardware. What's more, he keeps improving it, proposing and implementing new extensions and functionality and generally does what Creative was supposed to do: develop openal, only more efficiently and in the open.
And how does Creative respond? "Please avoid distributing OpenAL Soft" (subtext: "it would hurt our bottom line.")
One last thing: Linux will never gain EAX support (not even X-Fis!), since Creative keeps EAX3-5 proprietary. Fortunately, few games rely on EAX anymore (even Blizzard, long-time proponent, dropped it after WoW) and OpenAL EFX, EAX's successor, can be implemented by anyone incl. OpenAL Soft (at least as far as I can see.)Last edited by BlackStar; 23 January 2009, 11:16 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
@bulletxt: your worthless hysteria is not helping anyone, especially not the linux community. I don't know why such abusive behaviour is tolerated here, however I hope you grow up by the year 2020.
Originally posted by BlackStar View Post@mgc8:
Hardware wavetables are long dead. Music production now relies on virtual instruments, sequenced with MIDI, so the quality of the wavetables does not even matter. MIDI is no longer used for music distribution - and even if it was, you'd get better quality through software wavetables, anyway.
Originally posted by BlackStar View PostFPS hit on games? Let's say you lose 2 FPS on software sound. If you spent these 80$ on a better video card, you'd gain 10 FPS!
Better sound quality? Not if you use the digital connectors. Even if you don't, a Xonar would sound even better.
Originally posted by BlackStar View PostThere really is no point in buying a Creative sound card anymore, especially given the company's notoriety for monopolistic practices and general anti-consumer behavior (bad support, bad drivers). Your money are better spent elsewhere.
As far as Creative is concerned, at least they finally did the right thing -- their motives don't matter, and some childish behaviour of ignoring them out of spite won't help anyone. At the worst it will prove to other companies contemplating a free/open driver that the Linux community is a bunch of teenagers with superiority complexes. As I said before, I think the ALSA devs are above that and they really have a reason for not using the free source that's already out there...
Originally posted by DanLThat's not really an issue with modern CPU's. If you want to be a clueless gamer and reward Creative for making EAX completely closed/proprietary and patent-trolling any competing positional audio standards, then by all means, keep giving money to Creative.
All big companies are doing wrong from time to time, and it's the customers' job to yell at them when they do. It's also fair to acknowledge the rare occasions when they do the _right_ thing and work with them to increase the frequency of such.
Leave a comment:
-
until I found out that the EAX is still emulated in software so you get fps hits in games
Leave a comment:
-
Bulletxt, I share your sentiments about Creative, but that was uncalled for.
@mgc8:
Hardware wavetables are long dead. Music production now relies on virtual instruments, sequenced with MIDI, so the quality of the wavetables does not even matter. MIDI is no longer used for music distribution - and even if it was, you'd get better quality through software wavetables, anyway.
FPS hit on games? Let's say you lose 2 FPS on software sound. If you spent these 80$ on a better video card, you'd gain 10 FPS!
Better sound quality? Not if you use the digital connectors. Even if you don't, a Xonar would sound even better.
Lower latency for music production? Again there are much better offerings out there - X-Fi's are not really suited for this.
There really is no point in buying a Creative sound card anymore, especially given the company's notoriety for monopolistic practices and general anti-consumer behavior (bad support, bad drivers). Your money are better spent elsewhere.
Leave a comment:
-
don't even dare to blame ALSA developers for missing support on linux side. if there is a shitty company that does shitty drivers (even on the Windows side), that company is called CREATIVE.
and now, if you use your brain, CREATIVE released the specs(actually the drivers became GPL) only after real competition came in the market like ASUS Xonars cards... and wanna know what? they work on linux with ALSA. so
so shut up and smell the coffy. I hope ALSA supports X-fi in year 2020. now go and enjoy your wavetable card.Last edited by bulletxt; 21 January 2009, 07:59 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DanL View PostAnyway, I can't say I feel too sorry for the uninformed sheep that keep flocking back to Creative to get screwed time and again.
Oh, and by the way -- please tell me the name of just 1 (one) other card except the SBLive/Audigy line that can support HARDWARE wavetable (preferably also in Linux) and costs the same. Just one.
So yeah, other soundcards exist but they are little more than glorified integrated chipsets, I don't really see a point in buying any such card -- with fully digital connections, there is no difference in SNR or sound quality and it all comes down to the drivers. And Creative (although with a bad track record) do have better ones than the likes of Asus...
So all this attitude about "punishing" anyone is like cutting your nose to spite your face -- it's not helping anyone and it sounds like kindergarten logic. I'd like to give the ALSA devs the benefit of the doubt and consider them above that level, even though the open-source driver has been out there for... how many months? they really don't have much in the form of an excuse anymore.
Leave a comment:
-
yea, what I actually meant was: if a user buys a xonar card instead of an x-fi, i'm happy because its -1 customer for creative.
as for the support in alsa, that was just a joke. but I really wouldn't put my hand on a fire saying an x-fi card will fully work as it should for october 2009....
Leave a comment:
-
you deserve this Creative.
Anyway, I can't say I feel too sorry for the uninformed sheep that keep flocking back to Creative to get screwed time and again.
so don't be surprised really much if x-fi doesn't work in Ubuntu 9.10
As for OSS4, I keep up with the mailing list, and it seems like the devs there are content with the basic X-fi stereo driver (which works well for most X-fi cards). Unless someone's working on it without fanfare, they seem to have other priorities (MIDI, USB audio).
Leave a comment:
-
My microphone doens't work in ALSA 1.0.18 (I don't have the capture devices anymore). I hope 1.0.19 fixes the problem. Many HDA-Intel cards have similar problems (the .18 version was pushed via updates in Fedora).
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: