Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Playing Around With Ubuntu's Snaps, On Fedora

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jacob View Post
    You are wrong: snap does let you declare required frameworks. I'm not that familiar with Flatpak but from reading its website it seems to me that snap does everything that Flatpak does, and probably more.
    lol, it was not hard to fool you

    Comment


    • Originally posted by GraysonPeddie View Post
      Ok. I got snapcraft installed, but the only command that I have is snapcraft and not snap. I did have to install python-yaml, python-jsonschema, python-magic, and python-docopt in order to try out snapcraft. I tried "snapcraft find *" and got an output:

      Code:
      [grayson@htpc ~]$ snapcraft find *
      Usage:
      snapcraft [options] [--enable-geoip --no-parallel-build]
      snapcraft [options] init
      snapcraft [options] pull [<part> ...] [--enable-geoip]
      snapcraft [options] build [<part> ...] [--no-parallel-build]
      snapcraft [options] stage [<part> ...]
      snapcraft [options] prime [<part> ...]
      snapcraft [options] strip [<part> ...]
      snapcraft [options] clean [<part> ...] [--step <step>]
      snapcraft [options] snap [<directory> --output <snap-file>]
      snapcraft [options] cleanbuild
      snapcraft [options] login
      snapcraft [options] logout
      snapcraft [options] upload <snap-file>
      snapcraft [options] list-plugins
      snapcraft [options] help (topics | <plugin> | <topic>) [--devel]
      snapcraft (-h | --help)
      snapcraft --version
      Unfortunately, there is no snap command.
      Code:
      yaourt snapd
      is the command.
      Works like a charm!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by gururise View Post
        • Linux x86_64 (deb) - 229MB
        • Linux x86_64 (rpm) - 229MB
        • LibreOffice AppImage: 246 MB
        • Mac OS X x86_64 - 201MB
        • Windows x86_64 - 238 MB
        • Linux x86_64 (snap) - 287MB
        Put down your pitchforks people! Sometimes I feel like people will rage against anything canonical does...
        well, canonical made you forget to list flatpak size, it's a solid reason for hate

        Comment


        • Originally posted by viceversa View Post
          Via SNAP:

          Code:
          wget http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/snappy/libreoffice_5.2.0.0.beta2_amd64.snap
          sudo snap install libreoffice_5.2.0.0.beta2_amd64.snap
          Speaks for itself.
          what really speaks for itself is that you missed step of disabling selinux
          Originally posted by viceversa View Post

          If Fedora thinks flatpak is the future of linux packaging, just leave them to their playground.

          flatpak ---> BetaMax
          Snap ---> VHS
          yeah, systemd was betamax and upstart was vhs

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Leenooks View Post

            Code:
            yaourt snapd
            is the command.
            Works like a charm!
            Thanks. Will try them out.

            Update after a while later: Okay. Got snapd installed. It looks like there will be more snap packages shown up as time goes by. There are even Linux kernels that are designed for Snappy Core in mind. There's even owncloud as well.

            Oh, and remove that stupid JavaScript that raises and shrinks the text box. As I hold down the backspace, the text box raises and shrinks like crazy. Seriously! GET RID OF IT!!!
            Last edited by GraysonPeddie; 17 June 2016, 04:49 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by chrisb View Post

              SHA is a checksum not a signature.
              Sure, it is.

              But snap daemon probably can't guess by itself what the package signature has to be, because that package doesn't come from a known repository or store, in this LibreOffice beta case, better than this digest that user has to download then check with given sha512sum command.

              Comment


              • Canonical needs to stop. I don't understand how people reply so contently to their press releases.
                https://www.happyassassin.net/2016/0...da-department/

                Comment


                • Originally posted by computerquip View Post
                  Canonical needs to stop. I don't understand how people reply so contently to their press releases.
                  Originally posted by https://www.happyassassin.net/2016/06/16/on-snappy-and-flatpak-business-as-usual-in-the-canonical-propaganda-department
                  If you want to distribute your snaps, your choices are 1) publish it through the Canonical store, entirely under Canonical’s control, 2) upload it as a file and tell people to use the CLI to install it, or 3) try to figure out how to reconfigure the snap client to use a different server by reading the source code, then write your own server end from scratch, and tell your users to do that. Hmm.
                  Indeed.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X