Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gentoo Starts Work On KDE-Wayland Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • duby229
    replied
    Valve doesnt have any choice but to stick with X. If they move to Wayland they screw Canonical. If they move to Mir they screw everyone else. What's unfortunate is that if Mir never existed this wouldnt be an issue at all. There is already too much fragmentation. What Mir adds pushes it past a tipping point. Canonical should be forced to die. (yes, a.k.a murdered.)
    Last edited by duby229; 19 June 2013, 07:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gps4l
    replied
    Originally posted by curaga View Post
    What makes you think the professional market will move to either, instead of staying on X for the next decade?
    Thats what gabe newell said, valve will do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ericg
    replied
    Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    However, the professional market only uses legacy applications.
    Id be willing to bet RHEL8 will be Wayland based, or at least Wayland-optional... Gnome and KDE should have full Wayland support out in stable releases by then, so Fedora would have it, and the version of Fedora RHEL8 is based off of should have it then too.

    Leave a comment:


  • pingufunkybeat
    replied
    Originally posted by Vim_User View Post
    Why should they? Gnome will have full Wayland support soon, the same is true for KDE, so the main desktops that are used by the two main enterprise distributions support Wayland. Wayland will is faster and more secure than X, so there remains only one reason not to use Wayland: legacy applications. But since things like XWayland exist this reason is not valid, so it is the only logical step to go to Wayland once the enterprise distributions think it is stable enough.
    However, the professional market only uses legacy applications.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vim_User
    replied
    Originally posted by curaga View Post
    What makes you think the professional market will move to either, instead of staying on X for the next decade?
    Why should they? Gnome will have full Wayland support soon, the same is true for KDE, so the main desktops that are used by the two main enterprise distributions support Wayland. Wayland will is faster and more secure than X, so there remains only one reason not to use Wayland: legacy applications. But since things like XWayland exist this reason is not valid, so it is the only logical step to go to Wayland once the enterprise distributions think it is stable enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • pingufunkybeat
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike Frett View Post
    That's find and dandy, but what about Nvidia and AMD drivers?. If Canonical gets it's way, we may have NV and AMD telling us that if we want drivers then we need to move to Mir. And that's the whole ballgame. because I see zero point in using something with hacked drivers and no 3D support. Past two days I've been on mailing lists and IRC channels and there isn't a soul that knows anything yet. It's all in wait-and-see mode with a lot of finger pointing.
    You people are hilarious.

    Nvidia and AMD are supposed to stop supporting RedHat and SUSE so they can support Ubuntu exclusively? In other words, stop supporting their main customer base, so they can support the vast Ubuntu gaming community?

    Binary blobs are primarily workstation drivers. Running games is an accident. Linux gamers are a very vocal minority, but they are not their market.

    Leave a comment:


  • duby229
    replied
    Originally posted by pumrel View Post
    If there is not to be a 3D support for Wayland well then I think there is no point in using it. Moreover if Valve is targeting Ubuntu, then obviously AMD and Nvidia are going to preferentially write drivers for Ubuntu too. In that case I will be forced to ditch KDE in favor of accelerated Unity.
    You seem to have taken a que from incorrect information. The OSS drivers do have 3d support and will work with Wayland. So no need to worry about acceleration. It already is working. It has been for a while.

    Leave a comment:


  • duby229
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike Frett View Post
    That's find and dandy, but what about Nvidia and AMD drivers?. If Canonical gets it's way, we may have NV and AMD telling us that if we want drivers then we need to move to Mir. And that's the whole ballgame. because I see zero point in using something with hacked drivers and no 3D support. Past two days I've been on mailing lists and IRC channels and there isn't a soul that knows anything yet. It's all in wait-and-see mode with a lot of finger pointing.
    What you wrote makes no sense at all. It's gibberish. But it seems to imply that the OSS drivers are dirty hacks with no 3d support, which is obviously wrong. If this post represents your level of understanding, then you really need to do a lot more reading.

    Leave a comment:


  • 89c51
    replied
    Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
    Seriously, guys, it's obvious and it's been obvious for a long time that NVidia is planning to support both Wayland and Mir. Both, because supporting either one essentially gives you support for both.

    And while AMD's fglrx plans are unknown, they'll obviously match any support NVidia has. The only question is how long it will take them before they get around to doing it.
    If AMD manages to give us proper PM i don't give a fuck what fgrlx and nVidia will do.

    Leave a comment:


  • halfmanhalfamazing
    replied
    I have complete confidence Nvidia will support Wayland

    Here's why:

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X