Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
There's Talk Again About Btrfs For Fedora
Collapse
X
-
Chris Mason is no Jeff Bonwick. I doubt many people would want to use a Mason distro. Sun, on the other hand, was trusted by a lot of people for putting out a dependable OS.
-
ZFS was developed for Solaris, by Sun. How can you know that if Chris Mason had his own distro that he wouldn't have used Btrfs already?
Going by when Sun started to trust ZFS enough for default doesn't count in my eyes. they didn't need to convince other distros.
Besides, defaults are just the safe settings for people who don't know what they're doing. Enterprise people do.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RahulSundaram View PostSUSE recommends ROOT filesystem be Btrfs and you are still claiming they don't trust it? I cannot take you seriously anymore.
You are grasping at straws. Let me try to make it simple for you. If the SUSE developers trusted btrfs, it would be the default filesystem without the user needing to select it. What one person writes in the documentation means little. What the distro actually does, and whether it defaults to btrfs filesystem automatically, is the real indicator.
btrfs is not the default filesystem for SUSE, or any other major distro. Clearly SUSE, as well as all the other major linux distros, think btrfs is not ready to be trusted as the default filesystem.Last edited by jwilliams; 17 January 2013, 11:52 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jwilliams View PostThose are not indicators. Those "appliances" are small-time, niche products. If SUSE actually trusted btrfs, they would have it as the default filesystem.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RahulSundaram View PostThere are appliances that are in the market with Btrfs as default and SUSE recommends Btrfs as root filesystem as well. I don't think you can ignore all these indicators.
What no rational person can ignore is that no major linux distro trusts btrfs enough to have it be the default filesystem. That shows that btrfs cannot be trusted for widespread, serious usage. btrfs is simply not ready for prime-time, despite nearly 6 years of development. It is hard not to wonder if btrfs will ever be trustworthy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jwilliams View PostAn even better indicator is that none of those vendors trust btrfs enough to make it the default filesystem.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RahulSundaram View PostProduction level deployments and commercial support from multiple vendors are strong indicators of the maturity level of the filesystem.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jwilliams View PostWhich is irrelevant to my comment that btrfs still does not have a conservative distro that uses btrfs as the default filesystem. .
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: