Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Benchmarks: Mandriva, PCLinuxOS, Ubuntu, openSUSE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gseaman
    replied
    Originally posted by Shining Arcanine View Post
    Ah, okay. It would be nice if the information on software versions was contained in some sort of a table because I am having trouble deciphering it in its current format.

    It is difficult to make heads or tails of these results to know exactly what is affecting each benchmark result.
    I've been using the bfs scheduler in PCLinuxOS for a couple of months. I don't believe the scheduler is responsible for the speed in these tests. Latency and responsiveness is usually in competition with throughput. It does make things seem faster, though!

    Galen

    Leave a comment:


  • Shining Arcanine
    replied
    Originally posted by deanjo View Post
    BFS is the Brain Fuck Scheduler.

    http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/bfs-faq.txt
    Ah, okay. It would be nice if the information on software versions was contained in some sort of a table because I am having trouble deciphering it in its current format.

    It is difficult to make heads or tails of these results to know exactly what is affecting each benchmark result.

    Leave a comment:


  • deanjo
    replied
    Originally posted by Shining Arcanine View Post
    What BFS do you mean, Breadth-First Search?
    BFS is the Brain Fuck Scheduler.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shining Arcanine
    replied
    Originally posted by kUrb1a View Post
    Woow,...I was thinking of trying PCLinuxOS for a long time,I newer imagined that it was that good.
    Seriously,BFS killed all distros in these tests.Too bad that it doesn't use all newest packages .
    What BFS do you mean, Breadth-First Search?

    Leave a comment:


  • frej
    replied
    Originally posted by Zajec View Post
    I thought of the same. KMS and in case of UMS screen size matters as well.

    If screen size was set bigger than current display resolution, it could cause worse performance (counts to UMS only).
    It's very like KMS vs. UMS. Quake3(live) on a X1500 radeon is unplayable with KMS. With UMS i get 125FPS pretty much all the time....

    If you boot with radeon.modeset=0 you can disable it, X/mesa should still work.
    Would be nice if phoronix actually did a comparison between KMS/UMS, or just did a simple check if mandriva/pclinux has disabled KMS....).

    Leave a comment:


  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by kUrb1a View Post
    Based on what people say about BFS it really shows that it has some benefits(like listening music and compiling something "without stuttering"),and performance gains.
    Yes, it has advantages like performance gains in some things.

    Leave a comment:


  • kUrb1a
    replied
    It's obvious that the whole reason why PCLOS won so many tests is not because of BFS that's why I said it's a shame that it doesn't use all latest things like other distros.But even without that anyone who knows that PCLOS is based on Mandriva and sees this tests can see why it's so god and can make some parallel between them.Based on what people say about BFS it really shows that it has some benefits(like listening music and compiling something "without stuttering"),and performance gains.

    Leave a comment:


  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by RealNC View Post
    Really? It never did here.
    Works for you, doesn't work here. it's funny to read this, because you were laughing in another thread saying "works for me".

    And yes, it didn't perform better in every test. That's true. I guess it sucks. It should have won them all, not just half of them. Lame.

    And I guess all those PCLinuxOS users don't have keyboards and mice.

    Seriously, some people...
    So, half of those tests is thanks to BFS, not mesa, KMS etc? Maybe many PCLinuxOS users aren't affected? Yes, it will suck till it will be more stable. I recommend you to shut up, because what you said is idiotic. Seriously, some people are idiots. It sucks because it kills mouse and keyboard input not because it didn't won them all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zajec
    replied
    Originally posted by monraaf View Post
    One thing missing from the article is which of the tested distros were running with KMS enabled and which ones weren't. I suspect this is were the performance difference in the OpenArena and Tremulous benchmarks comes from.
    I thought of the same. KMS and in case of UMS screen size matters as well.

    If screen size was set bigger than current display resolution, it could cause worse performance (counts to UMS only).

    Leave a comment:


  • RealNC
    replied
    Originally posted by kraftman View Post
    Good joke. It doesn't perform better in every test. It usually kills mouse and keyboard input.
    Really? It never did here.

    And yes, it didn't perform better in every test. That's true. I guess it sucks. It should have won them all, not just half of them. Lame.

    And I guess all those PCLinuxOS users don't have keyboards and mice.

    Seriously, some people...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X