Originally posted by libv
View Post
Originally posted by libv
View Post
even though the featureset was othogonal, now let me guess the problem was with the people trying to contribute not with you? We've somehow managed in every other driver developed to do both modesetting and acceleration work at the same time in the same codebase. Now what makes unichrome special?
Originally posted by libv
View Post
For all intents and purposes, that can be described as a fork. The radeon r500+ code did not exactly help getting older hardware support stable, now did it? And i guess you never really managed to hit that "I can do modesetting in 1500 lines" statement you made on XDS Cambridge.
RadeonHD development has pretty much stopped because:
Unichrome stopped dead when you moved to work on RHD, and RHD has pretty much stopped dead since you went the other way and Novell people got re-routed. I don't think -ati or KMS would stop because I decided to do something different and similar for Alex or Jerome or Corbin or anyone else. The thing is to create a sustainable open source driver you need to create a community of developers and testers around it and for some reasons projects involving you this doesn't seem to happen.
Also didn't you say KMS would never work.
I find this all rather amusing how you are responding here. Why is your reaction this extreme all of a sudden? Did I say anything that puts you on shaky ground?
Dave.
Leave a comment: