Originally posted by jacob
View Post
What part did you think wasn't serious? Because at a minimum, all the technical aspects are obviously true (except the JS part which as I said is taken on faith), and the opinion parts (except the final paragraph, which I admit is tongue-in-cheek even if theoretically possible), while certainly opinion, are aligned with all available evidence and contradicted by none of it. Whatever it is that triggered this sudden sulk is on you, not anything I wrote.
Leave a comment: