Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

System76 vs. The LVFS Firmware Updating Service

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • M@GOid
    replied
    Looks like Redhat NIH in full swing. If their solution for everything is not used, must be bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdack
    replied
    Don't do business with RedHat.

    Leave a comment:


  • boxie
    replied
    +1 for the use of the word defenestrated

    Not enough things get thrown out of windows!

    Leave a comment:


  • andre30correia
    replied
    the question here! how much Dell pay for this guy say that

    Leave a comment:


  • numacross
    replied
    Is System76's hardware capable of updating using just the UEFI? For example on newer Dells you can update the UEFI with itself by pressing F12, selecting the updater and providing the universal .exe (FreeDOS- and Windows-capable) on a FAT32 partition either on a HDD or USB storage.

    Updating the firmware from the OS, especially Linux, is nice to have, but an OS-agnostic way is very useful too.

    Leave a comment:


  • phoronix
    started a topic System76 vs. The LVFS Firmware Updating Service

    System76 vs. The LVFS Firmware Updating Service

    Phoronix: System76 vs. The LVFS Firmware Updating Service

    This week the latest open-source drama was a differing of opinions between Richard Hughes of Red Hat who maintains Fwupd and LVFS for Linux firmware updating from the desktop and that of Linux PC vendor System76...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X