Originally posted by starshipeleven
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PowerNex: A Kernel Written In The D Programming Language
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by aht0 View PostThen another forum user complaining over NIH (and that they should help out with Linux instead) felt just incredibly funny in that context..
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View Postcan you please explain why linux-bigots should say it is progress? Anything not moving Linux forward is not progress for linux-bigots.
Also, it's licensed with MPL (more permissive license), not GPL, so that's blasphemy for linux-bigots.
You manage to bew even more troll fail than him. Slow clap.
Then another forum user complaining over NIH (and that they should help out with Linux instead) felt just incredibly funny in that context..Last edited by aht0; 18 July 2016, 11:44 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by aht0 View PostOh but it's all progress.. just read some random Linux-bigot
Probably interesting personal challenge for a coder, much more interesting than contributing to projects of others..
Also, it's licensed with MPL (more permissive license), not GPL, so that's blasphemy for linux-bigots.
You manage to bew even more troll fail than him. Slow clap.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Master5000 View PostGreat! Another fucking kernel. That will go after Hurd that is a turd. Great work guys! Don't help with what already works! Be original! Reinvent the PC! Fuck Intel! Make your own chips!
Probably interesting personal challenge for a coder, much more interesting than contributing to projects of others..Last edited by aht0; 18 July 2016, 09:26 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Michael_S View PostBut to be fair, the Go team has been working very hard to optimize their garbage collector and they've achieved performance on par with Java.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Delgarde View PostBut for whatever reason, it never really caught on - and over time, it's lost what advantage it had.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Michael_S View PostOn the highly popular C++ vs D debate, D2.0 came out in in 2007 and most of the language features that currently exist were in place in 2010, comfortably before C++11 and C++14. The comparison between D and C++17 with all of the latest C++ language features and recommended coding practices is tough. I still maintain that D is a better language, but C++11 and newer is good enough that when you weigh in all of the existing C++ code you can use with it, D is a hard sell.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Master5000 View PostD. Always wondered why they called it that. Now I know. Because D comes from Dead. D is Dead. Only moronic hipsters would use it. Especially to write an OS.
9.5/10, near perfect.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Master5000 View PostD. Always wondered why they called it that. Now I know. Because D comes from Dead. D is Dead. Only moronic hipsters would use it. Especially to write an OS.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: