If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Ok, point taken.
But you must understand the reason behind my question, i see far more space dedicated to AMD/ATI news or related stuff in Phoronix, it would be a shame to see an excellent and a supposed impartial site like this turn to either one of the gpu manufacturers.
I'm sorry if i didn't express myself in a more appropriate way.
i see far more space dedicated to AMD/ATI news or related stuff in Phoronix,
That's simply because there is more to actively report on and that they are willing to send us new drivers early for benchmarking, etc. On the NVIDIA side, there's good and bad days whether they cooperate and let us know in advance new information, etc. I am more than willing to work with both companies and have been doing so.
Would there actually be interest for putting an ebuild
for gentoo in that repository, too?
Of course it would be useless, when it actually hits
portage, but during driver release and ebuild release in
portage it might be helpful to some people and it could
also be a nice way to have the latest ebuild using git,
until it's in the tree officially.
(Normally the ebuild changes a little bit from day to day.)
Actually I'm using git already for my local portage overlay.
Would there actually be interest for putting an ebuild
for gentoo in that repository, too?
Of course it would be useless, when it actually hits
portage, but during driver release and ebuild release in
portage it might be helpful to some people and it could
also be a nice way to have the latest ebuild using git,
until it's in the tree officially.
(Normally the ebuild changes a little bit from day to day.)
Actually I'm using git already for my local portage overlay.
Comment