Originally posted by duby229
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Core i9 7960X Linux Benchmarks
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by sdack View PostMay I ask that you take a closer look at 4.14 before you start doing your Coffee Lake tests? If it's true and 4.14 does indeed give a noticeable advantage to Intel CPUs (due to their support of PCID and AMD's lack thereof) then you might be able to save some time by combining the tests and also to give us a look ahead into how the CPUs will compare in the future.Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
Close to twice the price, for less than twice the speed up in most cases, and it even manages to tie/lose in some scenarios. AMD really caught Intel unprepared. I feel AMD deserves a buy this time around, if only for pushing performance per price forward.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckula View PostAnother very powerful product from the #1 contributor to the Linux kernel.
People who complain about the price over AMD ought to remember that AMD doesn't contribute anything to Linux outside of (sometimes) providing drivers for its own hardware. The trivial markup for a 16 core Skylake X -- which is also clearly a better value than cheap Threadrippers -- shows that you not only care about quality and innovation but that you want Linux to thrive into the future instead of dumping money on the company whose founder and CEO took kickbacks to testify in favor of Microsoft in federal court.
Thanks for the solid review too Mike!
Incidentally, now that these products are all out on the market, a writeup about the Open Porous Media benchmarks that use these new chips would be helpful.
They are after owning market share, and will do whatever it takes to accomplish that. If that means contributing to the Linux Kernel to give there systems a slight edge, then that is what they will do.
Both companies are in the game to make money. And I don't see how you can say the 16 core Skylake X is "clearly better value". You can say the Skylake X 16 core is faster than the current Threadripper offerings. On average from the tests performed, it is 45% faster, brought up to that point by only 2 tests providing an 80% increase in performance, and 2 tests giving 3x the performance. The rest were 30% or lower, and in a few cases, a loss. So, as always, it depends on what you are going to be using the system for as to if it will provide any performance gains. The 7960X costs 80% more than the Threadripper. Not a clear better value in my book.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael View PostYes already started some 4.12~4.14 on 7980XE a few hours ago.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeder View PostClose to twice the price, for less than twice the speed up in most cases, and it even manages to tie/lose in some scenarios. AMD really caught Intel unprepared. I feel AMD deserves a buy this time around, if only for pushing performance per price forward.
A handful of excited enthusiasts does not a company make. I'm hopeful, but have bad memories of where this all led before (and AMD was looking a bit more corporate back then).
Comment
-
Another Meh X299 CPU, no ECC, more power draw and I suspect temperatures aren't awesome either. at $999 may make TR a tough choice unless you need ECC but at $1700 this is not even funny at this point. Also remember X299 don't support Nvme raids without an extra dongle and only with Intel M.2(which are meh as well), less usable PCIe and the on-board M.2 slots are through DMI(which I find idiotic at best for HEDT) capped at one X4 PCIe speed.
I guess the only reason this CPU exists is for reviewers, so Intel marketing can claim they have the fastest CPU and few hwbot overclockers like Dr8bauer and kingpin for the Lulz, otherwise I really can't find a way to justify this messy platform.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment