Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LLVM Still Looking At Migration To GitHub

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Looking at the migration docs here, this migration will break the standard build structure and you'll have to manually add symlinks or special CMake flags. This is an ugly solution. Anyone have any ideas on how to keep the current directory structure?

    At this point the clang, llvm, and libcxx individual repositories are cloned and stored alongside each other. There are CMake flags to describe the directory structure; alternatively, you can just symlink clang to llvm/tools/clang, etc.

    Comment


    • #12
      How about bzr? I'm sure Canonical would support it 110%.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by caligula View Post
        How about bzr? I'm sure Canonical would support it 110%.
        Canonical pretty much abandoned bzr development in 2012.
        The whole thing is developed at a snail's pace and is inferior to git anyways.

        Why would someone willingly switch to an outdated protocol when there is a compelling and well supported standard (git) available?

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by caligula View Post
          How about bzr?


          Comment

          Working...
          X