Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mesa Begins Its Transition To Gitlab

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mesa Begins Its Transition To Gitlab

    Phoronix: Mesa Begins Its Transition To Gitlab

    Following the news from earlier this month that FreeDesktop.org would move its infrastructure to Gitlab, the Mesa3D project has begun the process of adopting this Git-centered software...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    No more fetching Mesa for me... (because it's on Google-hosted instance)

    Comment


    • #3
      A big topic under discussion in that thread is bug reporting (Gitlab vs Bugzilla).
      Last edited by shmerl; 24 May 2018, 11:51 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Why not github?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by cl333r View Post
          Why not github?
          It's self hosted Gitlab and it's FOSS. Does Github allow self hosted instances?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by shmerl View Post

            It's self hosted Gitlab and it's FOSS. Does Github allow self hosted instances?
            yes, github enterprise allows on premises instances.
            The license is not FOSS though.

            Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
            No more fetching Mesa for me... (because it's on Google-hosted instance)
            "cgit and anongit will not be orphaned: they remain as push mirrors so are updated simultaneously with GItLab pushes"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by orome View Post

              yes, github enterprise allows on premises instances.
              The license is not FOSS though.
              It's also very expensive while Gitlab is free.
              And Github does not have CI, have a much less powerful issue tracker and less powerful features overall.

              Github shines with its community but that aspect is completely irrelevant when self hosting. They are each others difference, Gitlab also have a hosted service but that is a joke with downtimes, slowdowns and zero community.

              Hosted -> Github, no question
              Self hosted -> Gitlab, no question

              Comment


              • #8
                Brilliant, I like Gitlab.
                Free private repo's is great.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by suberimakuri View Post
                  Brilliant, I like Gitlab.
                  Free private repo's is great.
                  This is not gitlab.com, but a self-hosted instance. Gitlab is free software, which is great. The guys at gitlab are great!

                  It's a hassle to deploy, though, and quite ressource hungry. If that's overkill, you could try to self-host with gitea, cgit, "git http-backend", or even without web frontend: "git http-backend" or plain ssh/filesystem.

                  Edit: just realized that you could also obtain free private repos on freedesktop's gitlab as well... I wonder how that will play out?
                  Last edited by M@yeulC; 24 May 2018, 05:32 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by M@yeulC View Post

                    This is not gitlab.com, but a self-hosted instance. Gitlab is free software, which is great. The guys at gitlab are great!

                    It's a hassle to deploy, though, and quite ressource hungry. If that's overkill, you could try to self-host with gitea, cgit, "git http-backend", or even without web frontend: "git http-backend" or plain ssh/filesystem.

                    Edit: just realized that you could also obtain free private repos on freedesktop's gitlab as well... I wonder how that will play out?
                    You are wrong.

                    GitLab is Open Source, but not Free Source.

                    - Community Edition is more "free-like". A MIT license, I think to remember. But it's Open Source, of course in MIT/BSD style.

                    - Enterprise Edition(s) has source code available (with a lot of protection code that you need to break if you want to be "evil") but with a very restrictive license.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X