Originally posted by DebianXFCE Jr
View Post
2. I can read and understand "plain" English.
3. I think this one is most important. Is Server 2012/16/19 a 20 yeard old, closed source project? Can you be absolutely certain of it?
If it's closed source than what can we say about it?
Decompiling binaries for reverse-engineering and hacking.
Any CVE affecting a core windows component affects Server editions of the same age too. That's proof enough that they are the same?
4. Yes. I said it myself that CEOs don't always do what makes most sense. Which means switching to other kernel doesn't have to "make most sense from purely economical standpoint". Your words with my words in your last comment makes contradiction. Very easy to spot.
We are discussing possibilities, and you just can't read english properly.
It is possible for M$ to make a switch.
Comment