Originally posted by Dedale
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Linux Code of Conduct Revisions: CoC Committee Added Plus Interpretation & Mediator
Collapse
X
-
As long as "Linux Kernel Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct Interpretation" do not mention anything about meritocracy, as a good thing from the first place, nothing can be done.
Actually whole construction of this Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct started by attacking meritocracy as a fundamental concept, because would have stood in the way of minorities.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by BwackNinja View Post
They included a Code of Conduct at all (and the Contributor Covenant, no less), thus they want to appear inclusive. I'm not making judgments on the worth of inclusiveness, just noting what has been done.Last edited by Dedale; 20 October 2018, 04:01 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostMaybe it's the area and culture I grew up in, I didn't think people could have masculinity complexes this bad, but here I am reading this thread....
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by etam View PostIf you make a law and it needs 5 times bigger "Interpretation" document, that's alarming.
In Poland we have tax laws and the ministry of finances publishes interpretations. The worst thing that happens is, when they change the interpretation, it applies to past events.
This is offtopic however.
Comment
-
Originally posted by reavertm View Post
Only a miner or cryptocurrency speculant would mention above. While I agree with the sentiment in general (and that law should never work backwards), I welcome the interpretation in question as it deters people from mining, which I consider as pure energy wasting.
This is offtopic however.
Comment
Comment