Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ubuntu 11.10 To Replace GDM With LightDM
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by kraftman View PostFirefox is hardly replaceable,
OT, can you guys render www.mortgagegrp.com/site/sk/default.asp in FF on linux?Last edited by deanjo; 14 May 2011, 09:40 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Also, it's fine to talk about Eclipse (which is not GTK+ based either) and the GIMP, but then you should also mention the linux kernel (make xconfig) and VLC and Skype, which are Qt-only. All decent flashcard software like Anki, Mnemosyne and Parley are Qt-only, and there's plenty of other stuff.
But this war is old, and will probably still be around in 20 years.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't us GNOME stuff, but I also don't think that being "Qt-free" or "GTK-free" is a reasonable thing to strive for. Both are good toolkits used by some important software packages, and as long as they can integrate well (Qt does this, GTK still refuses due to political reasons), all is fine.
That said, I disagree with monraaf. The only GTK+ application that is really needed on a free desktop is GVim, which has no alternative, though Vim in a Konsole is an OK replacement.
LibreOffice and Firefox (with some gymnastics) are not based on GTK, and can run with a Qt-frontend instead.
Leave a comment:
-
@Monraaf
LibreOffice doesn't need Gtk:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by monraaf View PostWell if you want to put up with severely reduced functionality then I suppose you can opt for KOffice instead of LibreOffice, Krita instead of GIMP, Konqueror instead of Firefox or Chromium, KDevelop instead of Eclipse, and I'm not even sure there's a 'GTK+ free alternative' for Adobe Flash.
But who would want that? That's just torture, I don't think even kraftman is willing to submit to that .
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by monraaf View PostDude are on you some kind of Jihad against GNOME or something?
Ubuntu 11.10 will ship with GNOME 3, whether you like it or not. I know you are a hardcore Qt fanboy but lets get real here, all major apps on Linux have a dependency on GTK+, a Linux desktop without Qt is perfectly possible, one without GTK+ is just unthinkable.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nobu View Postnot sure...but I think gnash uses Gtk+, at least for their plug-in
That said, while I favour KDE and Qt, I don't exclude all applications that use GTK+, though I do consider their failure to integrate with the rest of my desktop a considerable drawback, and thus only use them if they have some other big advantage to make up for it.
Current Gtk+ applications I have installed are:- Firefox. It's KDE integration sucks, but it's plugin system and available plugins still kicks Requonq's arse. And there are still quite a few sites that isn't compatible with WebKit, but Gecko works just fine.
- LibreOffice. It's KDE integration is decent, though not quite native, but it's format support, and to a lesser extent feature set, kicks Caligra Suite's arse.
- The GIMP. While I use Krita for most tasks (and Kolourpaint for some of the simpler ones), there are still some tasks where The GIMP is king of the hill.
- Incscape. Karbon isn't even in the same league.
- Freeciv. Sorry, but Konquest is just not good enough for me
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by amphigory View Post
(P.S., not sure...but I think gnash uses Gtk+, at least for their plug-in. Don't know what lightspark uses)
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: