ASUS hd6770 hang with radeon.dpm=1 in X
drm-next 77ef8bbc87be7ad10b410247efc6d0f10676b401
tty looks like
With dpm T 39C, without 52C.
radeon_pm_info
uvd vclk: 0 dclk: 0
power level 0 sclk: 15700 mclk: 30000 vddc: 950 vddci: 1100
dmesg - http://pastebin.com/njw0hhtq
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Has Massive Radeon Patch Set - Power Management!
Collapse
X
-
My HD 6870 doesn't work with the latest patches. Once KMS is enabled during boot, the screen is covered in an abundant amount of artifacts that spell doom. It works with the previous patch set (drm-next-3.11-wip-5).
I'm using Arch with the latest mesa/ati related packages found here.
I noticed that HomeSp's 6870 is working fine with the latest patches, so oddly enough I'm hoping that this is a true regression and not PEBKAC, as I'd not like to waste anyone's time. Is there any information that I can give that might help resolve this?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by agd5f View PostI pushed some updated patches to my drm-next-3.11 branch that should fix the outstanding issue with NI asics and also adds a debugfs interface for tracking the current power state.
another issue is if i start with the drm-next-3.11 kernel radeonsi doesnt seem to work correctly[it spawn 1 ksoftirq per core and give hell to the CPU], i assume llvm need update, so ill compile today revision[i have 30 jun] with libdrm today git and see if persist. drm-next-wip-5 works fine tho
Leave a comment:
-
Latest Saucy builds for Ubuntu (drm-next) indeed seems to fix UVD on the Sony Vaio (RV710 ATI), though the screen flickering is still there. Unfortunately I can't find anything untoward in the usual logs or dmesg.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ibidem View PostCan dpm be enabled after loading radeon via sysfs, like dynpm?
If not, would it be possible to change that?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by agd5f View PostI pushed some updated patches to my drm-next-3.11 branch that should fix the outstanding issue with NI asics and also adds a debugfs interface for tracking the current power state.
Originally posted by IbidemCan dpm be enabled after loading radeon via sysfs, like dynpm?
If not, would it be possible to change that?
Leave a comment:
-
Can dpm be enabled after loading radeon via sysfs, like dynpm?
If not, would it be possible to change that?
Leave a comment:
-
I pushed some updated patches to my drm-next-3.11 branch that should fix the outstanding issue with NI asics and also adds a debugfs interface for tracking the current power state.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pali View PostOk, I can test something other, but I do not know that is needed for devs. Maybe devs already know this problem and do not need testing...
I see that desktop with enabled dpm is slower than with disabled. Also all KDE4 kwin effects are very very slow. So it is really problem (and not only bad output from glxgears)
so i guess the load in the GPU is not enough to push it outside the ULP mode and probably many cores are gating off too[depending your GPU] but without pminfo i don't know how to detect it properly
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jrch2k8 View Postfirst if you even expect a reply show Xonotic or some other game because glxgears is not a benchmarks, it just says how fast you can flip and other really simple operations, in your case if your CPU downclock cuz it enter in battery profile too it will affect heavilly glxgears result and it does not put enough load on the GPU to force them UP
I see that desktop with enabled dpm is slower than with disabled. Also all KDE4 kwin effects are very very slow. So it is really problem (and not only bad output from glxgears)
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: