Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Radeon KMS Gets Faster X-Video Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jonno
    replied
    Originally posted by DanL View Post
    No, I'm still running UMS until I get a legitimate reason to run KMS.
    I can give you two, at least for my workflow.
    1) No delay or flickering when changeing virtual terminals (Ctrl+Alt+Fx)
    2) OpenGL acceleration on more than one virtual terminal simultaneously!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonno
    replied
    I switched from fglrx drivers to radeon to get KMS some time ago, and got noticeable improvements in 2D (mainly scrolling and Kwin desktop effects) and video playback, as well as improved stability and fewer rendering bugs. I never did any actual benchmarks though, so this observation is more anecdotal than scientific.

    Anyway, even if KMS isn't as good as UMS yet, it still beats fglrx, so it's really nothing to complain about...

    Leave a comment:


  • Adarion
    replied
    Originally posted by Melcar View Post
    I did a small 2D test a while ago with my 200M. Been meaning to do one with my HD4850, but the damn thing takes so long to finish . Will cook up one for Xv as well latter this week.
    Thanks for the figures. Hmm, doesn't look that bright with KMS enabled. Well, but then it's considered still being in development. So, I guess more waiting until the situation becomes better from the user's side will do.

    Leave a comment:


  • xeros
    replied
    Thanks Melcar. Unfortunately it doesn't look too optimistic for KMS (yet). I thought that now the performance of KMS with R300-R500 will be at least as good as UMS/non-KMS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Melcar
    replied
    I did a small 2D test a while ago with my 200M. Been meaning to do one with my HD4850, but the damn thing takes so long to finish . Will cook up one for Xv as well latter this week.

    Leave a comment:


  • xeros
    replied
    Now we're waiting for some tests UMS vs KMS on Radeon cards R300-R700.

    Leave a comment:


  • DanL
    replied
    Originally posted by Melcar View Post
    With KMS?
    No, I'm still running UMS until I get a legitimate reason to run KMS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Melcar
    replied
    Xv works fine for the most part, except for some videos where it simply won't play or cause the players to crash. That Planet Earth birds clip that everyone likes for example. Interestingly enough, if I use the mplayer build from here it plays fine; smooth playback actually, despite my CPU usage going up the roof (not even even fglrx plays that clip that well without having to resort to XvBA).
    And yeah, that FireFox issue has been driving me nuts. Good thing I have been moving to Chrome.

    Leave a comment:


  • monraaf
    replied
    Xv was already working very good here. One of the areas where the oss driver really shines compared to fglrx. But of course any improvement is still welcome

    And I agree that EXA under KMS could use some speed improvement. I'm now in the situation where I have 2 screens, one fully accelerated EXA/Xv/3D, and one with only shadowfb 'acceleration'. Many 2D operations are much faster with shadowfb than with EXA acceleration.

    There are also at least two bug reports regarding this:


    Leave a comment:


  • Melcar
    replied
    With KMS? My HD4850 is chocking with simple 2D tasks. On my older card it's not as bad though.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X