Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Sandy/Ivy Bridge Gallium3D Driver Merged

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mattst88
    replied
    Originally posted by brosis View Post
    Intel should use Gallium, there is simply no excuse not using it, except NIH. Even rewriting it from scratch is time worthy! It would steamline the Kernel and Xorg.
    How many 3D drivers have you written?

    Leave a comment:


  • liam
    replied
    Originally posted by DanL View Post
    ..and it would help their competitors if Intel used its massive resources on optimizing Gallium3D infrastructure....
    They're already helping their competitors with their work on mesa, X, and wayland.

    Leave a comment:


  • remm
    replied
    Looking at their reactions, they're really annoyed by this "toy" driver, and did all they could to shoot it down. We'll see where it goes from there, but certainly Intel looks more interested in their competitive advantage than benefiting the entire Linux ecosystem.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ericg
    replied
    Originally posted by brosis View Post
    Intel should use Gallium, there is simply no excuse not using it, except NIH. Even rewriting it from scratch is time worthy! It would steamline the Kernel and Xorg.
    Its not a matter of NIH, the devs have said many times that the only reason they didn't move to Gallium was because they had spent so much time optimizing the classic driver already that they didnt want all that work to be for nothing. They were very happy with the classic driver they had written and decided to stick with it

    Leave a comment:


  • brosis
    replied
    Originally posted by DanL View Post
    ..and it would help their competitors if Intel used its massive resources on optimizing Gallium3D infrastructure....
    That would help Intel, not so competitiors. "Competitors" introduced Gallium first, mind you. Given limited manpower, it is stupid to build walled gardens in graphics stack. This is definately the most negative point about Intel drivers.

    Leave a comment:


  • DanL
    replied
    Originally posted by brosis View Post
    Intel should use Gallium, there is simply no excuse not using it, except NIH
    ..and it would help their competitors if Intel used its massive resources on optimizing Gallium3D infrastructure....

    Leave a comment:


  • brosis
    replied
    Intel should use Gallium, there is simply no excuse not using it, except NIH. Even rewriting it from scratch is time worthy! It would steamline the Kernel and Xorg.

    Leave a comment:


  • phoronix
    started a topic Intel Sandy/Ivy Bridge Gallium3D Driver Merged

    Intel Sandy/Ivy Bridge Gallium3D Driver Merged

    Phoronix: Intel Sandy/Ivy Bridge Gallium3D Driver Merged

    The modern Gallium3D graphics driver for supporting Intel Sandy Bridge "Gen6" and Ivy Bridge "Gen7" graphics has been merged into mainline Mesa!..

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X