Very interested!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD EPYC Launching 20 June, Are You Interested?
Collapse
X
-
Seeing how we've already seen the performance of the exact CPU cores in action I'd be more curios as to the performance of the Frontier Edition GPUs that AMD announced yesterday that they're going to release June 27th. Because of that I'd ask that if you're going to spend $1000 on hardware, that you'd spend it on that instead.
Then again I'm not a premium member, but I do try to donate $20 every year to keep the site running (used to give that money to Wikipedia, but stopped doing that after the editing of any even slightly political articles got way too political).
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zucca View PostI assume those which were on server CPU sockets? Since I have Opteron 3380 in my server on a AM3 motherboard... I doubt it's NUMA CPU...
Comment
-
Originally posted by L_A_G View PostThen again I'm not a premium member, but I do try to donate $20 every year to keep the site running (used to give that money to Wikipedia, but stopped doing that after the editing of any even slightly political articles got way too political).
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by phoronix View PostPhoronix: AMD EPYC Launching 20 June, Are You Interested?
Besides confirming the RX Vega launch for SIGGRAPH, AMD also announced today from Computex Taipei that their AMD EPYC launch is happening on 20 June...
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...-Launch-Coming
As a Premium subscriber, I would much prefer you save the money and get an RX Vega card instead (assuming you won't get a review sample), and CPU core scaling benchmarks with your existing Ryzen would be really great (2+2 vs 3+3 vs 4+4).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shevchen View PostWould love to see some core-to-core benches on games that are known to use more cores. Fuzzing around with scaling (beginning at 4 cores and then up them to the maximum) to see, if something breaks in between and if, how strong that effect is - not only because of NUMA, but maybe also to see eventual issues in the game code itself.
2. You also probably know that a processor with 32 cores is most likely running each core at a lower frequency than a processor of the same architecture with lower number of cores;
Hence, why on earth are you asking EPYC to be benchmarked for gaming? Even a game that is "known to use more cores" today will be more than satisfied with Ryzen 7's 8 cores.
Gaming is a small market segment and definitely not the target audience of a chip like this that may cost equal to a Ryzen 7 1800x + a high end GPU card just for the processor. And then the motherboards will likely cost 2x and - I hope - will not include the typical LED circus that gamers seem to love so much.
Comment
Comment