Originally posted by shmerl
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA's 64-bit "Denver" Tegra K1 Should Be Amazing
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Imroy View PostNvidia will likely use the same core in successive chips - I'm guessing a quad core next. Then there might be a chip with a Maxwell-based GPU.
Comment
-
Denver core size isn't an issue.
Originally posted by emblemparade View PostWell, maybe. The problem with Denver is that the die size is huge ... quad core will have to be quite enormous, maybe too big for mobile applications.
Besides, while the CPU cores are twice as large, they still account for a fairly paltry percentage of the whole chip. The GPU portion is several times larger than all CPU cores combined in any version.
More likely is that they simply want the two versions to be drop-in compatible (save software, of coarse), so they needed to have the same or very similar physical footprint and external memory bus / memory controller. Since the two Denver cores can issue up to 7 instructions with two of those being load/stores each, and the 4 32-bit cores can issue only 3 instructions with one of those being a load/store, they're actually pretty evenly matched in terms of potential of-chip-memory operations. Its likely that simply adding additional Denver cores would become memory starved without a significantly beefier memory interface.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imroy View Post"Denver" is just the name of the core(s), not the whole chip. Nvidia will likely use the same core in successive chips - I'm guessing a quad core next. Then there might be a chip with a Maxwell-based GPU.
Oh, and one reason that Denver is so powerful is because its instruction decoder/scheduler is 7 operations wide, compared to Cortex-A15's 3-wide (and Apple's Cyclone at 6-wide). This is a really powerful core, at least as far as ARM processors go. It will be interesting to see how much electrical power it draws though.
Comment
Comment