Originally posted by ryao
View Post
then i did explain to you that the X86 tax is mitigated or removed with X86S architecture what drops any 16bit and 32bit parts of the chip. this gives you 10% cheaper chips for the same performance.
then you asked for even more and i told you opensource chip design could zero out any profit int he chip design what would give you another 20-30% more performance for the same costs.
"It is so bad at 3nm that people are questioning whether further investment in new process technology makes sense, since the density improvement is equal to the increased cost, and for the next process, the cost is likely to outweigh the density improvement."
lets assume you are right at this point i would say it is still worth it.
because some designs at the high performance range is impossible to develop at 28 nm or 12nm or 7nm or 5nm or 4nm...
means some customers do have in fact a lot of money and they don't care to spend it for these customers
a 2nm or even 1nm process node is still profitable to made.
these customers are not poor people like your business you talk about. these people don't care to spend 15000€ on a CPU...
these people who spend 15000€ on a cpu plain and simple do have other problems than this: "the next process, the cost is likely to outweigh the density improvement"
they don't care about 15000€ per cpu. they plain and simple have the money.
Originally posted by ryao
View Post
it was just a typo sorry.
Comment