Michael , et al. : Apparently there's also an important fix in this ucode as well- it fixes an issue with either the IOMMU or its related processing.
I used to have issues if I'd enabled IOMMU in the kernel on my Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 (i7-1065G7 CPU). When suspending, randomly the machine would lock up going into the S3 state and drain the battery, requiring a reset when I'd try to resume later. (If I booted without IOMMU enabled in the kernel, suspend/resumes were rock-solid, but I'd prefer to have IOMMU on as I have Thunderbolt). With every IOMMU commit in Linus' master I'd try turning it on again, no change. When I got the 0x78 ucode version I'd tried it again, and it works now, tested over many cycles.
I regressed back to 0x46 to verify, and sure enough a couple of suspend cycles in, the issue recurred. I'm not happy about the performance hit you'd found, but I much prefer the reliability.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Ice Lake "0x78" Microcode Update Having Small But Measurable Performance Hits
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by moilami View PostI am waiting for a book which analyzes in detail this fall of Intel and rise of AMD.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yeeeeman View Post
Ice Lake core is 18% better in IPC. Say they lose at worst 5% with this microcode (to me it looks more like 1-2%) and they still have a 15% advantage over skylake, so they don't need to do anything to make Ice lake "look better" than previous gen.
18% faster than a 3.9Ghz turbo boost is only 4.6Ghz.Last edited by smitty3268; 11 May 2020, 11:05 PM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yeeeeman View Post
Ice Lake core is 18% better in IPC. Say they lose at worst 5% with this microcode (to me it looks more like 1-2%) and they still have a 15% advantage over skylake, so they don't need to do anything to make Ice lake "look better" than previous gen.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by birdie View Post
IceLake requires the same workarounds as Zen 2. Stop being an a-hole.- Ice Lake requires mitigation for CVE-2018-3665, Zen 2 doesn't.
- Ice Lake requires mitigation for CVE-2019-1125, Zen 2 doesn't.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by birdie View Post
IceLake requires the same workarounds as Zen 2. Stop being an a-hole.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by carewolf View Post
18% better IPC including all the workarounds needed for Skylake or before?
Leave a comment:
-
You should consult Anandtechs review on this. I think they had fixes for 9900K in place when they compared the IPC to 1065G7.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yeeeeman View Post
Ice Lake core is 18% better in IPC. Say they lose at worst 5% with this microcode (to me it looks more like 1-2%) and they still have a 15% advantage over skylake, so they don't need to do anything to make Ice lake "look better" than previous gen.
They need to fix and patch absolutely every single vulnerabilities and loop hole, even with the enquired performance penalties. Then, in the next core revisions they need to come up with ways to fix them in hardware and not lose performance. The "vulnerability craze" needs to end...
Leave a comment:
-
I am waiting for a book which analyzes in detail this fall of Intel and rise of AMD.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: