In first Place, you are wrong..
I am not Russian, but I am also European!
Second,
The point 2) and 3) and independent Analyses, and they even show better results than Baikal do( maybe due to more recent compilers, probably )!
They have the best scores on relative performance/Mhz/Power.
They tested samples,
Which are limited to 1.2Ghz or 1 Ghz.. Baikal can produce cluster of 4, 4+2, till 1.5Ghz..
To give you an ideia, Baikat T1, power consumption is less than 5 Watts..
So my Statement is accurate!
They have the best LowPower 32 bits CPU.
Tell me one that has better results than BaikalT1.
You asked for facts and I showed you facts,
Now show me a 32 bits processor with more performance, and less than 5 watts of power 32 bits?!
Can you do that?
I am not Russian, but I am also European!
Second,
The point 2) and 3) and independent Analyses, and they even show better results than Baikal do( maybe due to more recent compilers, probably )!
They have the best scores on relative performance/Mhz/Power.
They tested samples,
Which are limited to 1.2Ghz or 1 Ghz.. Baikal can produce cluster of 4, 4+2, till 1.5Ghz..
To give you an ideia, Baikat T1, power consumption is less than 5 Watts..
So my Statement is accurate!
They have the best LowPower 32 bits CPU.
Tell me one that has better results than BaikalT1.
You asked for facts and I showed you facts,
Now show me a 32 bits processor with more performance, and less than 5 watts of power 32 bits?!
Can you do that?
Comment