It may be result of
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Eighth Chamber)
7 September 2016 (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair commercial practices — Directive 2005/29/EC — Articles 5 and 7 — Combined offer — Sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software — Material information relating to the price — Misleading omission — Consumer unable to obtain the same model of computer not equipped with software)
About
EU court to decide on PC and software bundling
Submitted by Gijs Hillenius on July 02, 2015
s. The court seeks to determine what are unfair commercial practices, and what are misleading commercial practices. The Court of Cassation is asking the CJEU if bundling is unfair, and if it is unfair not to leave the customer much choice other than accepting the bundling or cancelling the sale.
Ruling means that it is not unfair unless there exists majority of users that feels affected by that practice...
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Eighth Chamber)
7 September 2016 (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair commercial practices — Directive 2005/29/EC — Articles 5 and 7 — Combined offer — Sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software — Material information relating to the price — Misleading omission — Consumer unable to obtain the same model of computer not equipped with software)
About
EU court to decide on PC and software bundling
Submitted by Gijs Hillenius on July 02, 2015
s. The court seeks to determine what are unfair commercial practices, and what are misleading commercial practices. The Court of Cassation is asking the CJEU if bundling is unfair, and if it is unfair not to leave the customer much choice other than accepting the bundling or cancelling the sale.
Ruling means that it is not unfair unless there exists majority of users that feels affected by that practice...
Comment