Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Few OpenCL Benchmarks With Radeon Vega Frontier Edition On Linux

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A Few OpenCL Benchmarks With Radeon Vega Frontier Edition On Linux

    Phoronix: A Few OpenCL Benchmarks With Radeon Vega Frontier Edition On Linux

    Phoronix reader "Yoshi" has graciously allowed me remote access to his newly-minuted Radeon Vega Frontier Edition workhorse paired with an AMD Ryzen 7 processor...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Titan X + Intel results for the same workloads: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...TR-NVIDIANEW41 Both cards have the same price of $1000.

    TL;DR: Vega on open-source ROCm stack is only slightly behind Titan X on proprietary driver.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Shnatsel View Post
      Titan X + Intel results for the same workloads: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...TR-NVIDIANEW41 Both cards have the same price of $1000.

      TL;DR: Vega on open-source ROCm stack is only slightly behind Titan X on proprietary driver.
      Keep in mind those Titan X results of mine are of Maxwell, not Pascal.
      Michael Larabel
      https://www.michaellarabel.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Vega FE is a bit above GTX 1070 level of performance for twice the price.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by xnor View Post
          Vega FE is a bit above GTX 1070 level of performance for twice the price, with immature drivers.
          fixed.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by starshipeleven View Post
            fixed.
            I looked at PCPers benchmarks at non gaming stuff and the results were all over the place. Sometimes it crushed the Titan, sometimes it loose badly.

            So I agreed with that guy that said it was rushed out of factory to meet the H1 promise of a Vega launch. The RX ones maybe have better drivers when they launch in a month.

            Comment


            • #7
              The results being all over the place is typical of AMD drivers... hopefully with then becoming open source they start improving more consistently if they can do that they they will beat the 1080 handily. At least the drivers seem to be stable if not consitently performant...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by cb88 View Post
                The results being all over the place is typical of AMD drivers...
                Not on windows, he is talking of Windows benchmarks https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...l-Testing-SPEC

                On Windows AMD has a long history of launching cards with immature drivers that nerf them and getting tons of flak in the first reviews, but the results were usually consistent nerfs.

                Here they are inconsistent, something works and it gets into spitting distance or even significantly better than Titan Xp, something is plain borked and it gets like half that, which does not make sense.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Michael View Post

                  Keep in mind those Titan X results of mine are of Maxwell, not Pascal.
                  Also the tests with Nvidia were with CUDA instead of OpenCL

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't think driver updates is going to improve the Vega's that much to the point that they are better then 1080GTX, but we can be hopeful. Lets not forget the NVIDIA cards have a good 150mhz overclock headroom (more for their memory).

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X