Originally posted by johnc
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA 375.10 vs. Linux 4.8 + Mesa 13.1-dev AMD GPU Benchmarks
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by fuzz View PostDid you even look at the evidence presented? I thought it was bullshit until I looked.
Really we can say that they all cheating, but really they just trys to enhance things here and there
Even every compression is cheating, S3 cheated near 2 decades ago with their compression, but from that time most games uses that
Comment
-
And of course there are a differences between JPEG and raw images, between MP3 and raw audio... but thing is most people did not notice that difference
Where nVidia "cheating" the most is on Ti cards, yes all that is cheating... but is intended in a way that most people would not notice anything
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View Post
Funny how they even admit it. The entire point here is review websites don't take it into account, thus leading to bias.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnc View Post
Ohh stop.
You people won't be satisfied until the colors on those graphs are completely reversed, then you'll be praising how representative of reality these benchmarks are.
For April 1 Michael should run the same benchmarks but switch the video card labels and colors. The forum thread would be hilarious.
The truth has always been that if you want open drivers on a discrete GPU you need to buy AMD. But you will have to accept a penalty in terms of performance and features. If you're willing to do that, fine. But don't lie to yourself and everyone else here and pretend that sacrifice isn't being made.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostAnd of course there are a differences between JPEG and raw images, between MP3 and raw audio... but thing is most people did not notice that difference
This is how the IT world improves!
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnc View PostThere is no "penalty" in "visual fidelity" and "quality of rendered output".
Another subtle point is that the mid range cards' VRAM is usually crippled somehow. So when the 970 or 1060's VRAM overflows most modern game engines dynamically reduce the detail of some textures. So the availability of much VRAM for cheaper cards doesn't just increase the lifespan but also prevents visual limitations. To be honest, from the visual point of view the games we have working on Linux are pretty much texture- crap, so they won't exceed your VRAM. This may change with the new Deus Ex and hopefully other games soon..
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnc View Post
There is no "penalty" in "visual fidelity" and "quality of rendered output".
Try making up some other excuse.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Passso View PostIf most people cannot see the difference it cannot be considered as "cheating", but more "optimization", and those who do not make it are "brute forcers"
This is how the IT world improves!
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment