Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NVIDIA vs. AMD Linux Performance For GRID Autosport

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • humbug
    replied
    Originally posted by rabcor View Post
    Interesting how the performance doesn't seem to drop in any significant way (on the contrary I think I'm actually seeing an increase...) on the AMD cards when the resolution is tripled... What is holding these cards back?
    This is often the case with AMD GPUs on Linux. It simply means the GPU hardware is not the bottleneck.
    i.e. the powerful GPU hardware is being held back by drivers and/or CPU botteneck, It's also the reason you often see lower than expected power consumption on AMD GPU systems in Linux; because they are not working hard. Increasing the resolution only increases GPU load, no change in driver or CPU overhead. Since the GPU is not being worked hard anyway performance remains comparable. That's why you get predictable scaling with resolution in windows because the drivers are efficient so the GPU workload becomes the bottleneck.

    On my R9 290 I remember when the Witcher 2 came out my GPU was not working hard at all despite low framerates. And then the situation gradually improved with game patches and driver updates.
    Last edited by humbug; 11 December 2015, 02:19 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dungeon
    replied
    Originally posted by rabcor View Post
    Interesting how the performance doesn't seem to drop in any significant way (on the contrary I think I'm actually seeing an increase...) on the AMD cards when the resolution is tripled... What is holding these cards back?
    No profile holding it, as AMD blob is per app driver mostly It is not unusual that after AMD made profile for particular game, that game start to work several times faster.

    There is CPU cap as usual, Michael should show CPU usage comparison during the game so you can clearly see it
    Last edited by dungeon; 11 December 2015, 02:14 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • rabcor
    replied
    Interesting how the performance doesn't seem to drop in any significant way (on the contrary I think I'm actually seeing an increase...) on the AMD cards when the resolution is tripled... What is holding these cards back?

    Leave a comment:


  • xeekei
    replied
    Originally posted by bridgman View Post

    You might want to hold off until the open source numbers come in:

    https://www.gamingonlinux.com/articl...r7-370-4g.6354
    That is very impressive. I'm looking forward to Arctic Islands.

    Leave a comment:


  • bridgman
    replied
    Originally posted by Scellow View Post
    Days after days we get confirmation that AMD on linux worth nothing, i planned to upgrade some piece of my PC this christmas, the thing that i'm sure to buy is a NVIDIA graphics card
    You might want to hold off until the open source numbers come in:

    You've likely already heard what Boss had to say about GRID and its Nvidia performance and now it's my time to show you how it ran on my AMD GPU.

    Leave a comment:


  • artivision
    replied
    Nvidia GPU = No Async Compute = Obsolete.

    Leave a comment:


  • justmy2cents
    replied
    Originally posted by tuke81 View Post

    Hmm maybe I really should update my OS from my desktop pc then(kde mint maya so ubuntu 12.04). I have dual core G3258@4GHz and gtx750ti and I can't get over 30 on average on low settings at 1680x150@120Hz resolution.
    don't know if these will help you anything. after you switch resolution restart the game. in some cases there is a bug where anything but started one completely underperforms. don't bother trying, just restart the game so it already starts at that resolution. at least for me game was stuck at VSYNC until i enabled and disabled it, until i did that i was somehow locked at 15, 30 or 60fps

    there are only 3 settings that really impact performance as far as i saw: MSAA, ambient occlusion and enhanced lighting.

    i7 810 (i think worse than yours cpu for this game since it doesn't really use multiple cores much), 750Ti, Fedora 22 (plain Gnome nothing modified) i get 65-70avg fps at 1080p everything on high except disabled lighting and MSAAx2 and this is with enabled fps counter in steam overlay

    Leave a comment:


  • Scellow
    replied
    Days after days we get confirmation that AMD on linux worth nothing, i planned to upgrade some piece of my PC this christmas, the thing that i'm sure to buy is a NVIDIA graphics card

    Leave a comment:


  • theriddick
    replied
    Yep, AMD better be sitting on a golden nugget with their miracle Vulkan drivers. Catalyst drivers really should be taken out back and have its skull stomped in!

    Leave a comment:


  • joni200
    replied
    AMD Catalyst is fun. The R9 Fury has under 4K Ultra more average-FPS (about 1) then under FullHD ^^

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X