A Blender cycles rendering benchmark could be another option too...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Where AMD's Catalyst Driver Does The Best On Linux
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by dungeon View Post
Per other Windows reviews i can't say Fury is best bang for buck when it comes to OpenCL performance as opossed to what happens to OpenGL... doubles OpenCL performance is even more slower then Hawaii which means 390/X is probably at best for the buck, of course if not some workstation FirePro cards
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety,deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Ben Franklin 1755
Comment
-
Originally posted by blacknova View Post
Blender's cycle engine OpenCL support is incomplete. No point using it as benchmark until it would support all features supported by CUDA implementation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by smitty3268 View PostWhy? You wouldn't want to compare it to the CUDA version (if the features used were different) but there's no reason you couldn't test the OpenCL backend against different drivers. It works well enough to do so and be meaningful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by xeekei View PostActually, I would be very interested in seeing an Nvidia's CUDA vs AMD's OpenCL test with Blender Cycles. This would very much affect a Blender user's purchase decision.
AFAIK, the OpenCL code in Blender currently disables a couple of options because it can't handle them yet. I'm not sure if those are disabled in the CUDA backend as well, or not - or if they can optionally be disabled.
Comment
Comment