Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel 520 Series SSD Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • erendorn
    replied
    Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    So why do larger SSDs perform better, anyway? Assuming that they all start filled with random data, that is.
    I think it's because they have the same memory chips, but more of them, so they more or less run them as raid0, up to the controller's limit.

    Leave a comment:


  • LinuxGamer
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post
    As said in the article, these are just some quick tests for reference purposes and done with the few drives that I have available.
    i really do like that System76 Gazelle Pro you have i may have to get me one some day for development (too bad they don't have Linux Mint preinstalled ) thanks for the reply sorry for being an ass

    Leave a comment:


  • GreatEmerald
    replied
    So why do larger SSDs perform better, anyway? Assuming that they all start filled with random data, that is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by LinuxGamer View Post
    is This Toms hardware? why are you Benchmarking a 64GB SSD vs 120GB vs 240GB SSD? none of them will run at the same at all in Benchmarks it needs to be 120GB vs 120GB you can put a intel 120GB vs a intel 240GB and the 240GB SSD will most likely kill it in Benchmarks
    As said in the article, these are just some quick tests for reference purposes and done with the few drives that I have available.

    Leave a comment:


  • LinuxGamer
    replied
    is This Toms hardware? why are you Benchmarking a 64GB SSD vs 120GB vs 240GB SSD? none of them will run at the same at all in Benchmarks it needs to be 120GB vs 120GB you can put a intel 120GB vs a intel 240GB and the 240GB SSD will most likely kill it in Benchmarks

    Leave a comment:


  • doom_Oo7
    replied
    What about doing the same while trying different filesystems ? Like F2FS, Btrfs, etc...

    Leave a comment:


  • blackout23
    replied
    Everyone stay the f*ck away from OCZ SSDs. Avoid them like the plague. Here is why:
    https://plus.google.com/115606635748...ts/CcdV1R67bpe

    Leave a comment:


  • GreatEmerald
    replied
    Interesting. I am thinking about getting one as well. The 2 minute boot times can get quite annoying at times, and last I checked Btrfs did a pretty nice job with hybrid SSD/HDD setups, too.

    On reliability, I'm not sure what to expect... On one hand HDDs are not very reliable due to all the moving parts and using magnetic media. On the other hand, SSDs have limited writes, last time I checked, so they need load balancing in order for the data to not reach that point. Unless they improved the situation recently?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyborg16
    replied
    I heard recently (at least, in the last year) that some Intel SSDs have errors when writing a lot of data (like when installing linux). Does that one exhibit that behaviour? At any rate, when I choose an SSD, it's for reliability...

    Leave a comment:


  • red_team316
    replied
    It also appears to be inline with the fact that larger SSD's should perform better than small ones. When 1TB SSD's are more common and come down in price a bit, I think that will be the sweet spot for most people. I've experienced the difference between a 60GB and a 240GB so with SSD's, the bigger, the better.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X