PowerMizer Is Not Likely The Problem In 256.xx Issue

[damentz]

guys/gals do post test results as well to backup your claims either for slowdowns or speedups or else simple 'impressions' might not be anything else but placebo

get the latest Unigine Sanctuary / Tropics / Heaven or LightsMark and do test them with each driver version on your system at this moment

if you don't bother to test why bother to post?

Thanks

To spite you.

[Shining Arcanine]

Nvidia released version 256.29 of their forceware drivers for Linux today. It appears to resolve this issue, which they claim is related to ACPI, which is power management.

[deanjo]

Nvidia released version 256.29 of their forceware drivers for Linux today. It appears to resolve this issue, which they claim is related to ACPI, which is power management.

Figured it was a Powermizer issue. Micheal's graph even supports it.




That's well below the reference 500 Mhz clock.

[Licaon]

That's well below the reference 500 Mhz clock.

that's should not be the issue then, the performance would be lower than for 500Mhz only and not lower in another driver version

anyway @damentz: i loled

[Shining Arcanine]

Could it be that the frequencies are not being reported correctly?