Meanwhile, if you visit Oracle's btrfs page, you're greeted with this bolded information:
I suppose that's outdated, but...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Search Result
Collapse
50 results in 0.0263 seconds.
Keywords
Members
Tags
-
-
However, with FreeBSD, OpenIndiana, and Solaris 11 around - do you really want to?
Leave a comment:
-
'A better graphics stack?' I think you've misunderstood their focus.
In any case, thanks for reporting on them at least.
Leave a comment:
-
They're limited because of promised OS X and Linux compatibility -- not too many engines they could actually use.
They say they are looking...
Leave a comment:
-
That is what one expects, but without testing one can't be sure. Sometimes errors sneak through to release builds....
Leave a comment:
-
I thought they mostly used different display packages for that? AFAIK Android doesn't use X - I don't think webOS does either, does it?
...
Leave a comment:
-
It might mean that if you look in a dictionary but if it does its usage is entirely deprecated. Its usage is confined solely to the hillbilly cocktai...
Leave a comment:
-
I've always gotten the impression that high-dollar open source is confined to what you can't see and CLI administration anyway. That is, why should they...
Leave a comment:
-
-
What on earth is 'Augustiner-Schweinshaxe'? Any relation to SchilliX? Completely new?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Yeah - that's not exactly news.
On the other hand, other file systems 'get around' this problem by not even having vdevs and pools in the...
Leave a comment:
-
...
OpenIndiana is not 'another' fork - it's a desktop distribution based on illumos.
Leave a comment:
-
I think that attitude is so funny considering how many so-called FOSS people are enthusiastically using Macs with OS X on them.
Leave a comment:
Bottom Ad
Collapse
Leave a comment: