Originally posted by Vim_User
View Post
Do you mean this one? http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...32_final&num=1
The one where Clang/LLVM and GCC are mostly up to par, sometimes GCC faster, sometimes Clang/LLVM?
The one where Clang/LLVM and GCC are mostly up to par, sometimes GCC faster, sometimes Clang/LLVM?
Tux as GCC and beastie as CLANG.
So, you are in the mid-30s, a programmer, an expert in compiler design, but incapable of writing long blog posts?
But you have the time to troll Phoronix and do your "research" on the web to do so?
You know what unethical means, do you? You realize that lying is unethical, do you? So please provide a link that proves your claim that Apple added surveillance capability to Clang/LLVM, otherwise it is pretty clear who is the unethical person and this would be fail #5. Pretty nice number for only one post.
Apple has been known to put tracking capabilities on their hardware and software (see Richard Stallman).
And Clang is no exception.
Leave a comment: