There are already a couple of GUIs to control AMD cards, but after a while each of them encounters the hardware bugs present years after the cards have been released. And each of them, instead of fixing those bugs, finds their own hacky way of getting around it so it think bridgman statement still stands.
@smitty3268 7 months? It took them 4 years to support a basic feature such as 0rpm mode and it still has bugs.
@microcode Changing AA, Vsync, tesselation, power, clock, colour profiles, VSR... but there's a twist.
You do it with one click instead of writing a config file.
Off-topic: the talk "What UNIX cost us" by Benno Rice explains perfectly why you would want that.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Is Hiring More Linux Engineers For The Scheduler, Memory Management, Net I/O
Collapse
X
-
I love my 5900x + Radeon 6800 system. Excellent performance for a great price. I’m looking at a future AMD laptop to replicate the success, just waiting for something good with an RDNA2 GPU.
Originally posted by microcodeCan any of you guys who are talking about these GUI gpu configurators tell me what they are useful for? I remember these things when I was using Windows as a kid, but I've not used one since I was a tween so I don't remember why anyone would want to...
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Can any of you guys who are talking about these GUI gpu configurators tell me what they are useful for? I remember these things when I was using Windows as a kid, but I've not used one since I was a tween so I don't remember why anyone would want to...
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qaridarium
right... i really don't know what is the problem of creating a driver GUI...
in the past bridgman told us to create a driver gui before the driver has the hardware functionality is not worth doing it...
but today,,,, what kind of hardware functionality does the driver need to have to say the hardware side is finished so we can have a driver gui ?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Marco-GG View Post
Just like Intel I guess. I mean, they also have a Windows UI for their iGPUs that is not available on Linux.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by muncrief View PostUntil AMD creates a GUI for Linux, we will always know they consider Linux users second or third class citizens.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by muncrief View PostUntil AMD creates a GUI for Linux, we will always know they consider Linux users second or third class citizens.
Of course Nvidia is much, much, worse overall because they are closed source, but we shouldn't give AMD a pass for refusing to provide a Linux GUI. Especially now that they're finally making money again. With much of that due to the myriads of Linux users like me who supported them throughout their dark decade.
You should read some of the old comments.
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
I'd be happy to receive the old control panel, just give us something!
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
GUI comes up again... Maybe someone ought to list the desired features, and then there can be an easily re-post-able comment detailing which ones won't work and why.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by muncrief View PostUntil AMD creates a GUI for Linux, we will always know they consider Linux users second or third class citizens.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: