Thank you for your response. As you know, the Linux Foundation and the Linux Foundation's Technical Advisory Board submitted a letter on Friday to your University outlining the specific actions which need to happen in order for your group, and your University, to be able to work to regain the trust of the Linux kernel community. Until those actions are taken, we do not have anything further to discuss about this issue.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
University of Minnesota Linux "Hypocrite Commit" Researchers Publish Open Letter
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sonadow View PostI am making a direct accusation of double standards and hypocrisy against the active members of this forum, and only two have been able to come up and say that they don't think that way, even with the mask of anonymity protecting them. Because that's what most of this forum's members are.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Kver View Post
Your assumption that people with an interest in Linux want to see MS burn is just plain wrong.
Answer: two. Just. TWO.
I am making a direct accusation of double standards and hypocrisy against the active members of this forum, and only two have been able to come up and say that they don't think that way, even with the mask of anonymity protecting them. Because that's what most of this forum's members are.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by coder View PostThey tried government downsizing in the 1990s, but it ended up costing tax payers more to have the same services get outsourced and have to pay a 3rd party entity + the worker + a federal employee to ensure the contractors did the jobs they were hired to do.
If you mean just making government do 90% less, that would put us on a fast track to being a failed state. Most people have no idea of the multiplicity of ways their lives, jobs, and our modern systems depend on government. This message is being pushed by wealthy and powerful corporations and individuals because government is the only thing keeping them from fully exploiting the people to the fullest degree possible.
If you mean replacing bureaucrats with political appointees, that leads to politicization of the government and putting it in the pocket of whatever political party is in power. Having a non-partisan, professional federal workforce is far preferable to that. Government bureaucrats get attacked by the same forces that run contrary to the interests of the people, because bureaucrats are the front line workers of a government that's of the people, by the people, and for the people.
The libertarian wet dream is just that -- a dream. It never happened and it never could. What you want is effectively just for wealthy elites to have even more wealth and power, while the masses get squeezed, poisoned, flooded, and extorted.
Leave a comment:
-
So this research did prove that you can put bugs easily into the kernel, I hope phoronix will make an article once the university publish the result of the investigation.
Leave a comment:
-
They should fire the responsible people of that insane stupidity and make a substantial donation to compensate the damage, not just bad quality astroturfing.
This makes the recent IBM controversy about an employee using his Gmail address instead IBM.com one and such look a lot more innocent in comparison.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ddriver View PostSo are you saying that it is not a viable research field to determine if there are possibilities to establish viable attack vectors by means of code contribution?
Fake research, false conclusions, a waste of money, and an unethical methodology.Last edited by ultimA; 25 April 2021, 07:28 PM.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ddriver View Post
So are you saying that it is not a viable research field to determine if there are possibilities to establish viable attack vectors by means of code contribution?
Why not prevent .... say vehicle safety inspection tests from doing anything that the vehicle manufacturer hasn't authorized explicitly?
And you don't see how this might defeat the purpose of the study?
The real "crime" here is not what they did but that they were overly lousy and superficial with it. It doesn't even amount to making an effort, and as such, actually constitutes very little danger... if any...
At worst, this is nothing more than some spam that some people are getting paid to filter through. It is nothing exceptional, it is a part of our contemporary daily reality.
In general you can't perform experimentation on people without their consent, whether this fact defeats the purpose of your study or not. Code in the kernel is ultimately going into embedded devices that can't be readily updated, vehicles, security-critical products, etc. Do you not see where this should give one pause before experimenting upon the kernel without anyone's consent? There's no indication anyone thought any of this through before barreling ahead with this experiment.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DanL View PostWe've got a "cancel culture" and a "virtue signalling". Can I get a "woke mob"? I mean, enforcing consequences for using the kernel as an unwilling lab rat clearly makes one part of the woke mob.
The dude did intentionally sabotage Linux. There is zero free speech in what he did. If he just expressed his wished to make such sabotage, then that would had been free speech and deleting him cancel culture. But again, he committed actions other than free speech, he directly sabotaged a software project. It is not cancel culture to delete him.
- Likes 6
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: