100+ Linux Benchmarks Between The AMD Ryzen 7 4700U vs. Intel Core i7 1065G7

[rogowskys]

Looks like they are in line with my results, great! Has Renoir been working out well for you on Fedora 32? Haven't had a chance to test there yet.

I've only been running it a couple days, and it's my 2nd PC so I haven't had a good chance to really try it out. Graphic acceleration worked out of the box before the updates, and running on wayland has been smooth so far. I've tried a few games, Frostpunk via SteamPlay, and World of Warships via Lutris/Wine, and they launch to menus just fine. The ony game that gave me trouble so far is Civilization VI (native). It caused amdgpu to crash and reset. I haven't looked further into the issue yet.

Overall I'm very happy with this laptop so far, and the "out of the box" experience with Fedora has been great!

[Michael]

For what it's worth, I ran these benchmarks on my laptop (same model) on Fedora 32 w/updates.

The results are here: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/...NI-2005169NI43

Looks like they are in line with my results, great! Has Renoir been working out well for you on Fedora 32? Haven't had a chance to test there yet.

[rogowskys]

For what it's worth, I ran these benchmarks on my laptop (same model) on Fedora 32 w/updates.

The results are here: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/...NI-2005169NI43

[JustinTurdeau]

An exaggeration on top of an exaggeration on top of an exaggeration. AMD sect never fails to disappoint.

I have no particularly loyalty to any CPU vendor, but I always prefer a company that competes and innovates vs. one that constantly gets caught rigging benchmarks and has a long history of antitrust violations.

Why is it always multithreaded performance BS?

Because it's by far the most relevant metric for workloads where performance actually matters.

you don't understand the basic principles of desktop computing where single threaded performance is the end all.

Who said anything about "desktop computing"? Apparently you care about that. Good for you. Everyone else who cares about CPU performance couldn't care less about some GUI app that spends 99% of it's time blocked in main_loop().

[birdie]

No of course it is not. Fair comparsion but at the moment AMD Ryzen are far superior in almost all aspects. The only point at the moment where Intel can win is single core + high clock freq and this is almost not a real world scenario anymore. Each Review focusing on that... lets say can be considered as biased.

An exaggeration on top of an exaggeration on top of an exaggeration. AMD sect never fails to disappoint. I mean Intel still has undisputably the fastest single core CPUs using an arch from 2015 (Sky Lake) and AMD somehow "wins in almost all aspects". Bonkers!

95% of average people out there are more interested in single-core performance unlike what AMD fans have been touting since the multicore failure called AMD FX.

No of course it is not. Fair comparsion but at the moment AMD Ryzen are far superior in almost all aspects. The only point at the moment where Intel can win is single core + high clock freq and this is almost not a real world scenario anymore. Each Review focusing on that... lets say can be considered as biased.

What???? Absolute most tasks are limited by single-threaded performance even the ones which scale perfectly because at the end of the day you need to synchronize threads or wait for the last of them to complete.

And this is what matters for absolute most people out there. Even among Phoronix readers barely anyone compiles tons of code daily or (re)encodes videos.

Why is it always multithreaded performance BS?

Biased are you, sir. Not only biased you don't understand the basic principles of desktop computing where single threaded performance is the end all.

[Shtirlic]

Hmm, by default on my dell xps 7390 2in1 all cores working at 2500mhz with 15 watt set to /sys/class/powercap/intel-rapl-mmio\:0/constraint_0_power_limit_uw
and when i set 35watt all cores running on 3500mhz as in specs.

This is my highest result on geekbecnh 5 with this settings https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/2146033
1455 for Single-Core Score and 5205 for Multi-Core Score and there are results for 4700U https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu...page=1&q=4700U
with highest score multi-core score 6361 and single core at 1228

[CochainComplex]

If it's not in AMD favour it's rigged. Yeah, right.

No of course it is not. Fair comparsion but at the moment AMD Ryzen are far superior in almost all aspects. The only point at the moment where Intel can win is single core + high clock freq and this is almost not a real world scenario anymore. Each Review focusing on that... lets say can be considered as biased.

[birdie]

Or maybe these results are normal and the review you're talking about is just another case of Benchmarks Rigged^W Sponsored by Intel™...?

If it's not in AMD favour it's rigged. Yeah, right.

[CochainComplex]

Or maybe these results are normal and the review you're talking about is just another case of Benchmarks Rigged^W Sponsored by Intel™...?

If they would have had spend their bribe budget on node development they mostlikely would have 5nm++ already....but this happens if you give too much power to bs guys in the marketing team.

[MadCatX]

Here is an interesting bench by lab501. They put a 4800U and 10710U in the same chassis head to head at different TDP caps. The 4800U doesn't seem to run that much faster at 25 W TDP than at 15 W. It also pretty nothing but nukes the 10710U.

https://next.lab501.ro/notebook/english-lenovo-ideapad-s540-13are-vs-13iml-amd-ryzen-7-4800u-vs-intel-core-i7-10710u