Originally posted by starshipeleven
View Post
I agree that the bounce back and forth seems silly, but I can only guess it was done so they could support other 2X2 devices that didn't use NVMe. To get "driverless" operation, they had to let the NVMe device look like a USB device.
After reading this:
I just feel like the whole USB 3.2 is a stopgap until USB over Thunderbolt (USB4) comes out of the depths of someones lab and sweeps away all of this naming and speed idiocy. When USB4 comes around, there is still going to be a huge dependency on the quality of the cable and the number of pins wired in the C connector.
Leave a comment: