1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu 13.10 32-bit vs. 64-bit Performance

Michael Larabel

Published on 25 July 2013
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 43 Comments

While 64-bit Linux desktop support has been in good shape for years, it seems there's a surprising number of Intel/AMD Linux desktop users undecided whether to use the 32-bit or 64-bit installation images of their favorite Linux distribution. For the latest perspective on 32-bit versus 64-bit Linux performance, here are said benchmarks from the latest Ubuntu 13.10 development state.

With most new Intel/AMD x86_64 desktops sporting their fair share of system memory, there really are no major reasons left not to be using the 64-bit Linux installation images. The 64-bit problems of the past like compatibility problems with Adobe Flash, Wine, and Java are nearly non-existent.

Making the 64-bit path worthwhile -- among other reasons -- is generally better performance. We have been putting out 32-bit vs. 64-bit Linux benchmarks for many years, but we continue to see the question asked in various forums about which version should be used. Whenever we put out new i686 / x86_64 benchmarks they continue to attract a staggering number of views, so here we go again with our latest numbers...

On a Lenovo ThinkPad W510 notebook with Intel Core i7 CPU, the 32-bit and 64-bit images of Ubuntu 13.10 with the Xfce desktop were tested. The images were from 20130724 and feature Xfce 4.10 with the Linux 3.10 kernel. The proprietary NVIDIA graphics driver was also used. All of the benchmarking was handled in a completely automated manner using the open-source Phoronix Test Suite software.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  2. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  3. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
  4. AMD's Windows Catalyst Driver Remains Largely Faster Than Linux Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
  2. Is The Open-Source NVIDIA Driver Fast Enough For Steam On Linux Gaming?
  3. Linux 3.18 File-System Performance Minimally Changed But Possible Regressions
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D Is Catching Up & Sometimes Beating Catalyst On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 3.18-rc6 Released, A Worrisome Regression Remains
  2. HandBrake 0.10 Brings H.265 & VP8 Encoders
  3. Gngr: A New Web Browser Focused On Privacy
  4. Linux 3.18 Kernel: Not Much Change With Intel Haswell Performance
  5. More File-System Tests Of The Linux 3.18 Kernel
  6. Using NVIDIA's NVENC On Linux With FFmpeg
  7. There's Talk Again About An "Open To The Core" Ubuntu Laptop
  8. PowerVR SGX Driver Code Gets Leaked
  9. V2 Of KDBUS Published For Linux Kernel Review
  10. VirtualBox 4.3.20 Arrives, Still No Sign Of VirtualBox 4.4
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. PulseAudio 6.0 Is Coming & Other Linux Audio Plans For The Future
  2. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  3. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k
  6. Script for Fan Speed Control
  7. Debian Init System Coupling Vote Results
  8. The Slides Announcing The New "AMDGPU" Kernel Driver