1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

Sun Studio 12 vs. GCC3 vs. GCC4 Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 20 February 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - 26 Comments

Earlier this month we published an article looking at the Linux versus OpenSolaris performance when using the new AMD Shanghai Opteron CPUs. Ubuntu Linux was faster than OpenSolaris 2008.11 in nearly all of the tests, but as mentioned in that article, OpenSolaris is still dependent upon GCC 3.4 where as Ubuntu and most other Linux distributions are now shipping with the newer and much-improved GCC 4 series. Following that article being published, Sun Microsystems had requested some compiler tests since they were confident the results would be different had their Sun Studio compiler been used. Well, in this article we now have some OpenSolaris benchmarks from the same AMD setup using GCC 3.4, GCC 4.0, and Sun Studio 12.

GCC 3.4.3 is available via the Image Packaging System in OpenSolaris 2008.1 while GCC 4.0.2 was installed through the BlastWave package repository. Sun Studio 12 (2008/10/07) was installed manually after downloading it from the Sun Microsystems web-site. Beyond the compiler changes, OpenSolaris 2008.11 was left in its stock configuration with the Solaris Nevada 101b package-set, X Server 1.3.0, NVIDIA 177.80 display driver, and using the ZFS file-system on the entire hard disk.

The hardware components once again consisted of two AMD Opteron 2384 (clocked at 2.70GHz) quad-core processors, a Tyan Thunder n3600M motherboard, 4GB of Corsair DDR2-667MHz memory, 160GB Seagate Serial ATA 2.0 hard drive, NVIDIA GeForce 9800GTX 512MB graphics card, and the display was a Samsung SyncMaster 305T 30-inch LCD.

The benchmarks we ran for this OpenSolaris compiler testing were LAME MP3 encoding, Ogg encoding, timed PHP compilation, GnuPG, GraphicsMagick, and SQLite. In the tests besides the timed compilation, the Phoronix Test Suite built all of the tests from source using the respective compiler and the resulting binaries were used for the testing process. All stock compiler flags for each package were used.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Turning A Basement Into A Big Linux Server Room
  2. NVIDIA's $1000+ GeForce GTX TITAN X Delivers Maximum Linux Performance
  3. OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 15.04 vs. Fedora 21 Tests: Linux Sweeps The Board
  4. The New Place Where Linux Code Is Constantly Being Benchmarked
  5. 18-GPU NVIDIA/AMD Linux Comparison Of BioShock: Infinite
  6. Phoronix Test Suite 5.6 Adds New Phoromatic Enterprise Benchmarking Features
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 4.0-rc6 Kernel Released
  2. Automatically Managing The Linux Benchmarks Firing Constantly
  3. The Big Features Of The Linux 4.0 Kernel
  4. Mesa's Android Support Is Currently In Bad Shape
  5. Wayland's Weston Terminal Can Now Be Minimized
  6. Phoronix - Working Towards Faster Page Loads
  7. Improved OpenCL Support For Blender's Cycles Renderer
  8. Mesa 10.5.2 Packs In A Handful Of Fixes
  9. More Fedora/Ubuntu Linux vs. OS X OpenGL Benchmarks
  10. Intel Adds Mesa IR To NIR Translator & Makes Other NIR Improvements
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Introducing The Library Operating System For Linux
  2. Allwinner Continues Jerking Around The Open-Source Community
  3. AMD Is Hiring Two More Open-Source Linux GPU Driver Developers
  4. Open-Source Driver Fans Will Love NVIDIA's New OpenGL Demo
  5. Systemd Change Allows For Stateless Systems With Tmpfs
  6. GNOME 3.16 Released: It's Their Best Release Yet
  7. GNOME Shell & Mutter 3.16.0 Released
  8. GNU Nano 2.4.0 Brings Complete Undo System, Linter Support & More