1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Intel Glamor Acceleration Compared To SNA, UXA

Michael Larabel

Published on 17 May 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 5 - 11 Comments

Going back to last year there's been the "Glamor Acceleration" project out of Intel to accelerate the 2D operations within X using OpenGL on Mesa. This is similar to the Xorg state tracker approach and while it's not yet enabled by default, Intel OTC developers have been making much progress in recent months. In this article is a look at the recent Glamor update while comparing it to the stock Intel UXA acceleration as well as to the other experimental acceleration option: Intel SNA.

This UXA vs. SNA vs. GLAMOR acceleration comparison is being done from an Intel Core i5 "Sandy Bridge" system while in a future article will be the Ivy Bridge results.

Glamor began as a project to push the support into the X.Org Server, but it ended up being reworked to allow to serve as a standalone library that X.Org DDX drivers can optionally hook into. While it can be universal, so far Glamor has only been hooked into the xf86-video-intel driver. The Glamor acceleration design has gone through extensive work, primarily by the Intel China developers, since its debut. In December, Glamor became glamorous. At the end of April, Glamor 0.4 was released.

This initial Intel Core i5 2520M Sandy Bridge benchmarking comparing the 2D acceleration means was tested from an Ubuntu 12.04 LTS x86_64 base while moving to the Linux 3.4 development kernel, Mesa 8.1-devel from Git master, and the latest xf86-video-intel DDX driver from Git at the time. Glamor was also obtained from Git shortly after its 0.4 release.

Glamor and SNA aren't enabled by default in any configurations but requires rebuilding the DDX driver and for Intel Glamor there are other steps required. For Sandy/Ivy Bridge hardware, Intel SNA acceleration has been quite stable from my testing in recent months and overall tends to be faster and work quite well. Glamor, on the other hand, from this testing was still quite unstable in some tests.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Pentium G3258 On Linux
  2. SilverStone Precision PS10
  3. ASRock Z97 Extreme6
  4. Nouveau Re-Clocking Is Way Faster, Shows Much Progress For Open-Source NVIDIA
Latest Linux Articles
  1. KVM Benchmarks On Ubuntu 14.10
  2. X.Org Server 1.16 Officially Released With Terrific Features
  3. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
  4. Preview: Benchmarking CentOS 7.0 & Scientific Linux 7.0
Latest Linux News
  1. QEMU 2.1.0-rc3 Has More Bug Fixes
  2. Linux 3.17 To Fix Up ASPM, Bring Other PCI Changes
  3. CPUFreq Ondemand Could Be Faster, Use Less Power With Linux 3.17
  4. Intel Adds BPTC Texture Compression To Their Mesa Driver
  5. The Linux Kernel Bang-Bang Thermal Governor Is Banging
  6. NVIDIA Releases K1-Powered Shield Tablet & Controller
  7. Xen Project Announces Mirage OS 2.0
  8. Canonical Community Team Changes Announced For Ubuntu
  9. Raspberry Pi B+ ARM Debian Benchmarks
  10. Mozilla Unleashes Firefox 31 Web Browser
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Remote gui not accessible in Phoronix Test Suite 5.2
  2. AMD "Hawaii" Open-Source GPU Acceleration Still Not Working Right
  3. Open-Source Radeon Performance Boosted By Linux 3.16
  4. In Road To Qt, Audacious Switches From GTK3 Back To GTK2
  5. Debian + Steam + r600
  6. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  7. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
  8. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers