ATI Open vs. Closed-Source Performance

Published on November 04, 2007
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4
Discuss This Article

This past Friday we had delivered benchmarks comparing the performance of the open-source Radeon driver against the new closed-source fglrx driver from AMD. These benchmarks had just looked at the AIGLX performance when using Compiz on an Ubuntu 7.10 desktop. In all of the benchmarks except one, the fglrx driver had carried a staggering lead over the open-source competition. In addition to these Compiz benchmarks, on the same system we had also ran some additional benchmarks to see for gaming and 2D rendering how the two ATI Linux drivers compare.

The system once again was running Ubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy Gibbon" with the Linux 2.6.22 kernel and X server 1.3, but with these benchmarks, the Compiz effects were disabled during testing. The hardware included a PCI Express ATI Radeon X800XL 256MB graphics card, Intel Pentium D 820 (2.80GHz dual-core), 2GB of DDR3-1333 memory, and an ASUS P5E3 Deluxe (Intel X38) motherboard. We had used Enemy Territory and GtkPerf as our vehicle for benchmarking the two drivers, since both benchmarks are compatible with the current Radeon driver. The ATI driver used was fglrx 8.42.3.

The last time we had compared these two drivers was back in February with X.Org 7.2: ATI Open v. Closed Drivers. During that examination, Fedora 7 Test 1 was used with the fglrx 8.34 driver, and of course, that was running off AMD's old driver code-base. Mesa and the Radeon driver have also seen a few improvements since that point. Most notably, Mesa 7.0 does contain a number of improvements. In those earlier benchmarks, the Radeon X800XL with the open-source driver was over twice as slow as the X800XL with the fglrx 8.34 driver. However, in these benchmarks we had not looked at the 2D GTK+ performance.

For our Enemy Territory benchmarks, we had completed the timed-demo tests with a resolution of 800 x 600 and 1280 x 1024. For the GtkPerf tests, which as the name implies tests the GTK+ performance, we had reported the results for GtkComboBox, GtkCheckButton, GtkTextView - Add Text, GtkDrawingArea - Text, and the total time needed to run all GtkPerf tests. Each GtkPerf test was run 1,000 times.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  2. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  3. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D More Competitive With Catalyst On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  2. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  3. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  4. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  5. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  6. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  7. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
  8. JADE: An LLVM-Based Video Decoder For MPEG RVC
  9. Ubuntu 13.10 Likely Switching To Chromium Browser
  10. Unity 7, Compiz To Be Polished For Ubuntu 13.10
  11. Unity 8, Mir To Be Experimental Choice In Ubuntu 13.10
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Linux Game Development and a Qt Developers Rage
  2. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  3. Greater Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimization Tests
  4. Fedora 19 Alpha Gets Its First Delay Due To UEFI
  5. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  6. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite