Linux 4.7 - Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS vs. NTFS Benchmarks

Written by Michael Larabel in Linux Storage on 4 August 2016 at 08:11 PM EDT. 29 Comments
LINUX STORAGE
Continuing on from yesterday's Linux 4.4 To 4.7 - EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4.7. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS.

Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4.7.0 mainline kernel and using the stock mount options. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems, including ZFS On Linux.
Linux 4.7 - EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs vs. XFS vs. NTFS

So for those that wanted to see XFS and NTFS in yesterday's comparison, here are the latest numbers from the current Linux 4.7 stable kernel.
Linux 4.7 - EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs vs. XFS vs. NTFS

Linux 4.7 - EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs vs. XFS vs. NTFS

Linux 4.7 - EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs vs. XFS vs. NTFS

Linux 4.7 - EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs vs. XFS vs. NTFS

Linux 4.7 - EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs vs. XFS vs. NTFS

Linux 4.7 - EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs vs. XFS vs. NTFS

See the rest of these file-system benchmark results via this OpenBenchmarking.org result file.
Related News
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.

Popular News This Week