Radeon RX Vega 64: AMDGPU-PRO vs. DRM-Next + Mesa 17.3-dev

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 23 October 2017 at 02:53 PM EDT. Page 4 of 4. 37 Comments.
AMDGPU-PRO vs. Linux 4.15 DRM / Mesa 17.3-dev - RX Vega 64
AMDGPU-PRO vs. Linux 4.15 DRM / Mesa 17.3-dev - RX Vega 64

Mesa 17.3-dev is now delivering better performance with AMDGPU+RadeonSI over AMDGPU-PRO.

AMDGPU-PRO vs. Linux 4.15 DRM / Mesa 17.3-dev - RX Vega 64
AMDGPU-PRO vs. Linux 4.15 DRM / Mesa 17.3-dev - RX Vega 64

Xonotic is also faster with the fully open driver.

AMDGPU-PRO vs. Linux 4.15 DRM / Mesa 17.3-dev - RX Vega 64

The Furmark results are close.

AMDGPU-PRO vs. Linux 4.15 DRM / Mesa 17.3-dev - RX Vega 64

While GpuTest's triangle test does significantly better with RadeonSI.

Overall, the RadeonSI/RADV performance was excellent compared to AMDGPU-PRO on the Radeon RX Vega 64. It came as quite a surprise how well the RADV Vulkan performance is doing overall for these latest-generation AMD graphics hardware and then on the OpenGL side with RadeonSI it's only getting faster and faster than AMD's binary-only OpenGL driver.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.