Tonga AMDGPU Performance On Ubuntu 16.04 Has 80~90%+ Performance Of Catalyst

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 17 March 2016 at 03:19 PM EDT. Page 3 of 4. 45 Comments.
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS vs. Ubuntu 16.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Tonga Graphics

Unigine Heaven and Tesseract are the tests where AMDGPU+RadeonSI is struggling the most relative to the AMD proprietary driver.

Ubuntu 14.04 LTS vs. Ubuntu 16.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Tonga Graphics

Unigine Valley on the open-source driver stack competes much better than in Heaven.

Ubuntu 14.04 LTS vs. Ubuntu 16.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Tonga Graphics
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS vs. Ubuntu 16.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Tonga Graphics
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS vs. Ubuntu 16.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Tonga Graphics
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS vs. Ubuntu 16.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Tonga Graphics

Xonotic with low image quality settings led to better frame-rates with Ubuntu 16.04 than Ubuntu 14.04, but as the visual intensity increased, the open-source driver stack was falling behind Ubuntu 14.04 with Catalyst.


Related Articles