AMDGPU-PRO 18.50 vs. ROCm 2.0 OpenCL Performance
Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 19 January 2019. Page 4 of 4. 13 Comments

The OpenCL performance was mixed between these drivers for the Darktable RAW photography software.

The 18.50 driver picked up another win with the JuliaGPU benchmark.

Kernel latency was much lower with ROCm 2.0.

With a few exceptions, the clpeak performance was generally similar or better with ROCm 2.0.

Hopefully the ROCm 2.1 release this year will bring more performance tuning as its clear from some of these OpenCL benchmarks there is still more room to grow on the software side.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Related Articles
About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via

Trending Linux News