GeForce GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 Performance For Linux Gaming, Performance-Per-Watt
Written by Michael Larabel in Graphics Cards on 15 May 2019. Page 4 of 4. 4 Comments

Most modern Linux games, of course, can't even run fluidly going back to Kepler.

The performance difference from GTX 650 to GTX 1650 with CUDA workloads like NAMD were even more profound.

When looking at the performance-per-Watt overall across dozens of tests, it's a 3.1x improvement from the GTX 650 to GTX 1650.

The GTX 1650 installed led to an overall AC power consumption increase of just about 14 Watts on average or a peak difference of 27 Watts.

If looking at the geometric mean of all the GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 benchmark results, it's a 4.1x improvement going to this ~$150 USD non-RTX Turing GPU. More data over on

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Related Articles
About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via

Trending Linux News